My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 05-19-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
05/19/1997
>
6.2. SR 05-19-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:50 AM
Creation date
8/5/2003 8:45:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/19/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The landfill submitted a Long Term Development Plan (dated March, 1997) for city <br />review that proposed a final elevation of 1,170 feet. The cover letter from Victoria <br />Kreger that accompanied the landfill's submittal, dated March 27, 1997, also <br />identified 1,170 as the height being requested by the landfill in their MPCA and city <br />permits. <br /> <br />In a letter dated March 28, 1997, city staff member Stephen Rohlf expressed concern <br />over the 1,170 height to MPCA staff. <br /> <br />In a letter dated March 31, 1997, Greg Korstad, attorney for the landfill, requested <br />that language in MPCA's permit that referenced the required approval of the ultimate <br />landfill height by the City of Elk River and Sherbume County be stricken. <br /> <br />Bill Armstrong of MPCA staff confirmed in a letter to Stephen Rohlf, dated April 2, <br />1997, that the height of the landfill was not an issue that the MPCA permit will <br />address. MPCA considers final elevation to be land use issue to be resolved locally. <br /> <br />In a letter dated April 2, 1997, city staff member Stephen Rohlf highlighted the city's <br />concerns regarding the finished elevation at the landfill to Victoria Kreger and <br />emphasized the city's authority to regulate final elevation as a local land use issue. <br /> <br />City staff met with landfill representatives on April 9, 1997. The major topic of <br />discussion was the ultimate landfill height. City staff expressed the following <br />concerns regarding additional landfill height: <br /> <br />1. Negative impacts on neighboring property values and land use. <br /> <br />Negative aesthetic impacts - The property on which the landfill is situated <br />is already one of the highest points in a five county area. At 1,170 it <br />would be the highest point and a treeless dominate feature on the skyline. <br />Staff is concerned with how this elevation would impact nearby residences <br />and the Railroad Hiking Trail and Woodland Trails Park, both of which <br />currently offer natural settings. US Trunk Highway 169 is the major <br />corridor entering the city from the north. The average elevation of this <br />highway adjacent to the landfill is closer to 1,000 feet than it is to 1,100. <br />The landfill is the first thing one sees when entering the city from this <br />road. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Adding 70 feet to the elevation the landfill would exacerbate existing dust <br />and litter problems. <br /> <br />Allowing the landfill a large height increase over surrounding adjacent <br />property eliminates the potential to screen the landfill with trees. Trees <br />can not be planted on waste disposal areas because their roots will <br /> <br />Lanfi197 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.