CCC'97 will feature policy and leg-
<br />islative sessions, workshops, and
<br />roundtables on Capitol Hill with
<br />Congressional leaders to focus on the
<br />key issues the President and Congress
<br />will grapple with next year that will
<br />affect your city. These sessions are
<br />designed not only to provide you with
<br />insights about where the
<br />Administration and Congress are with
<br />regard to issues important to you and
<br />your citizens, but also to ensure that
<br />you have a direct opportunity to ask
<br />questions and make your views and
<br />concerns known.
<br /> Some of the key issues which will
<br />be addressed during the conference
<br />include:
<br />
<br />ELECTRIC
<br />DEREGULATION
<br />First, Congress deregulated local
<br />phones, long distance phone service,
<br />satellite television, and cable televi-
<br />sion X%w, the President and
<br />Co. , and the states are focusing
<br />on deregulating electridty. What do
<br />changing marketplaces and regulatory
<br />approaches mean to these services and
<br />more specifically what will the impacts
<br />be for cities and towns? Not everyone
<br />will be a winner. The changes state
<br />le~slatures and Congress will consider
<br />could force rating downgrades, losses
<br />in investor-owned utility revenues to
<br />city hall, or large rate increases to
<br />some of your citizens. What has hap-
<br />pened and what will happen to the
<br />classic old structures of many such
<br />"utility-like" services in the new world
<br />of deregulation and new technology
<br />where state, federal, and judicial
<br />worlds collide with unprecedented
<br />lobbying expenditures and fast grow-
<br />ing new industries? Will your city
<br />and its citizens be winners or losers?
<br />
<br />TAXING CITIES
<br />Federal taxes will be a hot issue in
<br />1997. Should Congress pull the old
<br />federal income tax out by its roots and
<br />replace it? Should Congress adopt
<br />sweeping tax cuts financed by deep
<br />cuts in priority municipal programs?
<br />Or ' ld the President and Congress
<br />agn new federal tax expenditures?
<br />What would changes to the federal tax
<br />structure mean to local taxes and rev-
<br />enues? What offsetting federal spend-
<br />lng cuts would the federal government
<br />make? What might happen to our
<br />
<br />municipal tax-exempt bonds, to feder-
<br />al highway and airport taxes, and to
<br />the deductibility of state and local
<br />taxes? This will be a truth or conse-
<br />quences session for local leaders.
<br />
<br />THE ENVIRONMENT
<br />After years of efforts by city leaders,
<br />Congress and the President enacted
<br />Safe Drinking Water mandate relief
<br />for cities in 1996. In 1997, Congress
<br />and the President are likely to turn to
<br />action on Clean Water and Supeffund.
<br />Key players from Congress and the
<br />Administration will explore what the
<br />main issues will be, what the potential
<br />impacts might be on cities and towns,
<br />and respond to your questions.
<br />
<br />CITIES, HOUSING
<br />AND COMMUNITY
<br />DEVELOPMENT
<br />With Congress and the President set
<br />to act on the nation's housing and
<br />community development programs,
<br />Congressional and Administration
<br />experts will examine the legislative
<br />options for 1997 and what those
<br />options might mean for city leaders.
<br />Some have proposed consolidating the
<br />Community Development Block
<br />Grant (CDBG) program with the
<br />HOME state and local housing block
<br />grant program. Others have discussed
<br />cutting funds and block granting pub-
<br />lic and assisted housing funds to
<br />states. What is likely to happen?
<br />What are the potential consequences
<br />for cities?
<br />
<br />NATURAL
<br />DISASTERS
<br />The shock of recent, catastrophic loss-
<br />es from earthquakes, hurricanes, forest
<br />fires, and floods around the nation has
<br />prompted Congress to reconsider
<br />funding for emergency relief, just as
<br />homeowners' insurance providers
<br />have limited or curtailed sales in disas-
<br />ter-prone areas, virtually halting
<br />
<br />ISTEA
<br />REAUTHORIZATION
<br />The Intermodal Surface
<br />Transportation Efficiency Act
<br />(ISTEA) expires in 1997, and the
<br />President and Congress must act on
<br />this key law to determine the future
<br />federal role for highway and transit
<br />funding in cities across the nation.
<br />This landmark legislation gave local
<br />governments decision-making author-
<br />ity regarding national transportation
<br />funds. Find out how this law wilt be
<br />rewritten over the upcoming year.
<br />Hear from members of Congress who
<br />support the preservation of ISTEA
<br />and from those who believe that state
<br />governments should have greater
<br />power in national transportation poli-
<br />cy. Ask questions to the key policy
<br />players about potential impacts on
<br />your city.
<br />
<br /> PUBLIC SAFETY
<br />With growing concern about
<br />increased drug use and juvenile crime,
<br />' what actions will the federal govern-
<br />ment take in 1997 to address local
<br />anti-crime and violence problems?
<br />This session will feature experts from
<br />the U.S. Justice Department and the
<br />Congress to discuss federal legislative
<br />initiatives and options, and what they
<br />might mean for cities and local lead-
<br />ers. Will the President and Congress
<br />retain the public safety block grant
<br />program? What new federal initia-
<br />tives might be considered to assist
<br />cities in confronting drugs and gangs?
<br />
<br />SPECIAL DISTRICTS -
<br />BARRIERS TO
<br />MUNICIPAL GROWTH?
<br />A water district or other special service
<br />district with a federal loan can stand in
<br />the way of your community's growth.
<br />A number of cities and towns have
<br />found that such districts can prohibit a
<br />city from providing full municipal ser-
<br />vices in areas annexed to a cit3' and
<br />
<br />home sales. What will the (~ do so with the support and encour-
<br />Administration propose? What will [~) agement of the federal government.
<br />Congress do to address compensa- d~b Some cities and towns believe that
<br />tion and loss for damage to public llll cash-rich districts have gone into
<br />property and infrastructure, as _~ debt with federal loans primarily
<br />wall as increasing claims from ~ to block a city from providing
<br />o ero of private property. /Ifil [ I ~x~x~ municipal utilit3 or other ser-
<br /> , vices in newly annexed
<br />
<br />about this federal program and the
<br />prospects of changing it.
<br />
<br />SPECTRUM FOR
<br />PUBLIC SAFETY
<br />Beth thc President and Congress are
<br />certain to return to the issue of spec-
<br />trum in 1997, an issue involving who
<br />will have access to this finite, public
<br />medium critical to municipal public
<br />safety telecommunications. In 1996,
<br />the President and Congress agreed to
<br />the sale of $2.9 billion of spectrum to
<br />the private sector, and the Presidential
<br />candidates proposed the sale of an
<br />additional $40 billion in 1997. In
<br />September 1996, the Public Safety
<br />Wireless Advisory Committee
<br />(PSWAC), composed of federal, state,
<br />and local public safety leaders and the
<br />private sector, issued a report, as
<br />directed by the President and
<br />Congress, stating that the current
<br />spectrum allocation is insufficient to
<br />meet today's municipal emergency
<br />response, police; fire, emergency res-
<br />cue. and other local public safety
<br />needs. This session will provide an
<br />opportunity to bear from key federal
<br />leaders about the actions they plan to
<br />take to respond to this report and what
<br />that response might mean to your
<br />police, fire, and emergency response
<br />departments.
<br />
<br />ENTITLEMENTS
<br />AND CITIES
<br />Early in 1997, the President will send
<br />the new Congress a proposal to bal-
<br />ance the federal budget over the next
<br />six years. That budget is almost cer-
<br />tain to propose cuts in key city pro-
<br />grams, but how much and where?
<br />Will the proposal call for the budget
<br />to be balanced on the backs of local
<br />services and taxes, and how will the
<br />President deal with the sacred cows of
<br />federal entitlement spending, like
<br />Medicare and Social Security? Will
<br />they be on the table? And how will
<br />Congress react? Could there be
<br />another shutdown of the federal gov-
<br />ernment? What will be the issues and
<br />consequences for local budgets?
<br />
<br />Make yom'
<br />voice heard
<br />
<br />areas. Attend this meeting
<br />and hear from federal and
<br /> today!
<br /> other experts
<br />
<br />_i I i! ~l i ,i
<br />
<br />
<br />
|