Laserfiche WebLink
CCC'97 will feature policy and leg- <br />islative sessions, workshops, and <br />roundtables on Capitol Hill with <br />Congressional leaders to focus on the <br />key issues the President and Congress <br />will grapple with next year that will <br />affect your city. These sessions are <br />designed not only to provide you with <br />insights about where the <br />Administration and Congress are with <br />regard to issues important to you and <br />your citizens, but also to ensure that <br />you have a direct opportunity to ask <br />questions and make your views and <br />concerns known. <br /> Some of the key issues which will <br />be addressed during the conference <br />include: <br /> <br />ELECTRIC <br />DEREGULATION <br />First, Congress deregulated local <br />phones, long distance phone service, <br />satellite television, and cable televi- <br />sion X%w, the President and <br />Co. , and the states are focusing <br />on deregulating electridty. What do <br />changing marketplaces and regulatory <br />approaches mean to these services and <br />more specifically what will the impacts <br />be for cities and towns? Not everyone <br />will be a winner. The changes state <br />le~slatures and Congress will consider <br />could force rating downgrades, losses <br />in investor-owned utility revenues to <br />city hall, or large rate increases to <br />some of your citizens. What has hap- <br />pened and what will happen to the <br />classic old structures of many such <br />"utility-like" services in the new world <br />of deregulation and new technology <br />where state, federal, and judicial <br />worlds collide with unprecedented <br />lobbying expenditures and fast grow- <br />ing new industries? Will your city <br />and its citizens be winners or losers? <br /> <br />TAXING CITIES <br />Federal taxes will be a hot issue in <br />1997. Should Congress pull the old <br />federal income tax out by its roots and <br />replace it? Should Congress adopt <br />sweeping tax cuts financed by deep <br />cuts in priority municipal programs? <br />Or ' ld the President and Congress <br />agn new federal tax expenditures? <br />What would changes to the federal tax <br />structure mean to local taxes and rev- <br />enues? What offsetting federal spend- <br />lng cuts would the federal government <br />make? What might happen to our <br /> <br />municipal tax-exempt bonds, to feder- <br />al highway and airport taxes, and to <br />the deductibility of state and local <br />taxes? This will be a truth or conse- <br />quences session for local leaders. <br /> <br />THE ENVIRONMENT <br />After years of efforts by city leaders, <br />Congress and the President enacted <br />Safe Drinking Water mandate relief <br />for cities in 1996. In 1997, Congress <br />and the President are likely to turn to <br />action on Clean Water and Supeffund. <br />Key players from Congress and the <br />Administration will explore what the <br />main issues will be, what the potential <br />impacts might be on cities and towns, <br />and respond to your questions. <br /> <br />CITIES, HOUSING <br />AND COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />With Congress and the President set <br />to act on the nation's housing and <br />community development programs, <br />Congressional and Administration <br />experts will examine the legislative <br />options for 1997 and what those <br />options might mean for city leaders. <br />Some have proposed consolidating the <br />Community Development Block <br />Grant (CDBG) program with the <br />HOME state and local housing block <br />grant program. Others have discussed <br />cutting funds and block granting pub- <br />lic and assisted housing funds to <br />states. What is likely to happen? <br />What are the potential consequences <br />for cities? <br /> <br />NATURAL <br />DISASTERS <br />The shock of recent, catastrophic loss- <br />es from earthquakes, hurricanes, forest <br />fires, and floods around the nation has <br />prompted Congress to reconsider <br />funding for emergency relief, just as <br />homeowners' insurance providers <br />have limited or curtailed sales in disas- <br />ter-prone areas, virtually halting <br /> <br />ISTEA <br />REAUTHORIZATION <br />The Intermodal Surface <br />Transportation Efficiency Act <br />(ISTEA) expires in 1997, and the <br />President and Congress must act on <br />this key law to determine the future <br />federal role for highway and transit <br />funding in cities across the nation. <br />This landmark legislation gave local <br />governments decision-making author- <br />ity regarding national transportation <br />funds. Find out how this law wilt be <br />rewritten over the upcoming year. <br />Hear from members of Congress who <br />support the preservation of ISTEA <br />and from those who believe that state <br />governments should have greater <br />power in national transportation poli- <br />cy. Ask questions to the key policy <br />players about potential impacts on <br />your city. <br /> <br /> PUBLIC SAFETY <br />With growing concern about <br />increased drug use and juvenile crime, <br />' what actions will the federal govern- <br />ment take in 1997 to address local <br />anti-crime and violence problems? <br />This session will feature experts from <br />the U.S. Justice Department and the <br />Congress to discuss federal legislative <br />initiatives and options, and what they <br />might mean for cities and local lead- <br />ers. Will the President and Congress <br />retain the public safety block grant <br />program? What new federal initia- <br />tives might be considered to assist <br />cities in confronting drugs and gangs? <br /> <br />SPECIAL DISTRICTS - <br />BARRIERS TO <br />MUNICIPAL GROWTH? <br />A water district or other special service <br />district with a federal loan can stand in <br />the way of your community's growth. <br />A number of cities and towns have <br />found that such districts can prohibit a <br />city from providing full municipal ser- <br />vices in areas annexed to a cit3' and <br /> <br />home sales. What will the (~ do so with the support and encour- <br />Administration propose? What will [~) agement of the federal government. <br />Congress do to address compensa- d~b Some cities and towns believe that <br />tion and loss for damage to public llll cash-rich districts have gone into <br />property and infrastructure, as _~ debt with federal loans primarily <br />wall as increasing claims from ~ to block a city from providing <br />o ero of private property. /Ifil [ I ~x~x~ municipal utilit3 or other ser- <br /> , vices in newly annexed <br /> <br />about this federal program and the <br />prospects of changing it. <br /> <br />SPECTRUM FOR <br />PUBLIC SAFETY <br />Beth thc President and Congress are <br />certain to return to the issue of spec- <br />trum in 1997, an issue involving who <br />will have access to this finite, public <br />medium critical to municipal public <br />safety telecommunications. In 1996, <br />the President and Congress agreed to <br />the sale of $2.9 billion of spectrum to <br />the private sector, and the Presidential <br />candidates proposed the sale of an <br />additional $40 billion in 1997. In <br />September 1996, the Public Safety <br />Wireless Advisory Committee <br />(PSWAC), composed of federal, state, <br />and local public safety leaders and the <br />private sector, issued a report, as <br />directed by the President and <br />Congress, stating that the current <br />spectrum allocation is insufficient to <br />meet today's municipal emergency <br />response, police; fire, emergency res- <br />cue. and other local public safety <br />needs. This session will provide an <br />opportunity to bear from key federal <br />leaders about the actions they plan to <br />take to respond to this report and what <br />that response might mean to your <br />police, fire, and emergency response <br />departments. <br /> <br />ENTITLEMENTS <br />AND CITIES <br />Early in 1997, the President will send <br />the new Congress a proposal to bal- <br />ance the federal budget over the next <br />six years. That budget is almost cer- <br />tain to propose cuts in key city pro- <br />grams, but how much and where? <br />Will the proposal call for the budget <br />to be balanced on the backs of local <br />services and taxes, and how will the <br />President deal with the sacred cows of <br />federal entitlement spending, like <br />Medicare and Social Security? Will <br />they be on the table? And how will <br />Congress react? Could there be <br />another shutdown of the federal gov- <br />ernment? What will be the issues and <br />consequences for local budgets? <br /> <br />Make yom' <br />voice heard <br /> <br />areas. Attend this meeting <br />and hear from federal and <br /> today! <br /> other experts <br /> <br />_i I i! ~l i ,i <br /> <br /> <br />