Laserfiche WebLink
Affected APPA Member <br />August 20, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />(separate from the RICE NESFIAP rule), compression ignition RICE that are "used to supply power to an <br />electric grid or that supply power as part of a financial arrangement with another entity are not considered <br />to be emergency engines." 7l Fed. Reg. 39,180, col. 1 (definition of emergency stationary internal <br />combustion engine). Only you would know whether you fall under the 2006 NSPS rule. We encoumge <br />you to ensure that you are in compliance with the 2006 NSPS, including seeking legal advice, if <br />necessary. <br />Because of the pervasive impacts of the new RICE rule on public power utilities and the concern it has <br />raised, APPA intends to work with our members to better understand the impacts of the rule, facilitate <br />information sharing among APPA and its members on the issue, and examine potential opportunities for <br />additional flexibility at the state or federal level. APPA is convening a group of experts on the RICE <br />issues within our membership to look at any further actions that might be undertaken by APPA. Tn order <br />to assist you in the interim, we have created amember-only website that should assist you in conveniently <br />finding the EPA materials that you will need as you assess the regulatory impact in your community. The <br />items that are posted on our website include: <br />• Final RICE Engine Compliance Extension Memo from outside counsel and copies of the form for <br />submittal to the EPA by August 3l, 2010. The memo is provided for your initial review. We <br />encourage you to seek your own counsel's advice as to any local circumstances on state <br />permitting issues or if your utility cannot yet know whether you will be covered by August 31, <br />2010. This memo is available at: <br />ht[o•//www.appanet.ore/files/RFP/Comp) ianceExtensionsWAttachment%2DFINAL.odf <br />• EPA's Final Decision to Continue Applying the Agency's Existing Interpretation of a Regulation <br />That Determines the Scope of Pollutants Subject to the Federal Prevention of Significant <br />Deterioration (PSD) Program under the Clean Air Act (03/29/2010) <br />• uestions Parts L and 2 of the EGU MACT ICR (02/25/10) <br />• Slides from the Tune 2010 APPA webinar on the RICE rule, available at the following link: <br />http•//www ap~anet org/files/PowerPoint/RICEPresentationAPPA ppt <br />• EPA's proposed Spark Ignition Proposed Rule, available on EPA's webpage a[: <br />htto~//www epa gov/ttn/oarpe/t3/fr notices/rice neshap fN81010 odf. Please see pages 107-109 <br />for EPA's reference to emergency usage and comments on emergency generation, limited use, <br />and other special circumstances. The deadline for comments is 60 days after the proposed rule is <br />published in the Federal Register (it has not been published as of today) which will likely be mid- <br />October and APPA encourages you to file comments on your own utility's behalf. We also are <br />soliciting comments that could address APPA's broader membership. Please contact J.P. <br />Blackford to submit ideas for filing comments by September 20. J.P. may be contacted at <br />jpblackford @appanet.org <br />In addition, there may be state regulatory issues that APPA has not tracked including whether or not your <br />state requires operating permits or General permits for operating these units. We encourage you to look at <br />the U. S. EPA materials provided to you on our website <br />thttp://www.appanet.or utility/index.cfm?ItemNumber=286931 and to also check into any applicability <br />under your state law. <br />We know that the coming decade will continue to put considerable pressure on all fossil fuel units- <br />whether they are for baseload generation or use such as these RICE units. The EPA is attempting to <br />regulate all sources of pollution (mostly SO2, NOx, mercury, COZ and carbon monoxide as in this RICE <br />rule). Their regulations promise to continue to require lower levels of allowable emissions through the <br />placement of control technologies. While the news in this rulemaking may not please many APPA <br />