Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes <br />May 27, 2003 <br />............................. <br /> <br />3.6. <br /> <br />3.7. <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MEMO TO ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES <br />COMMISSION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE <br />COMPENSATION PACKAGE (AS REVISED) <br />MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE FOR TIFFENY MCGUIRE TO <br />PRACTICE THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE AT SIMONSON'S SALON AND <br />DAY SPA <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />4. Joint Meeting with Sherbume County Board of Commissioners <br /> <br />A. County Road 33 and Highway 169 Interchange <br /> <br />City Engineer Terry Maurer provided an update on the progress of the project. He <br />noted that this was a MnDOT project and was scheduled for completion by <br />November. <br /> <br />B. County Road 33/77 <br /> <br />County Engineer Dave Schwarting provided an update on the realignment of <br />County Roads 32 and 77. He noted that this project is contingent on the future <br />connection to County Road 32. He indicated that the County is requesting the City <br />to make a commitment to this connection. Mr. Schwarting stated that the road <br />connection is a long-term plan which the County is interested in seeing completed. <br />If this connection is not going to happen then a slightly different County Road <br />33/77 realignment would be better for county traffic flow. <br /> <br />Mayor I~inzing indicated that the connection to County Road 32 was not in the <br />City's transportation plan and the Park and Recreation Commission did not <br />promote the connection. <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf indicated that the City should keep an open mind for a possible <br />future connection. Councilmember Motin indicated that he would like to see what <br />the impact would be if the road was extended through the park. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council to revisit the issue regarding this issue at a later <br />date. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz stated that Elk River Utilities was going to do some work in <br />the area but were not informed about the realignment project. He requested that <br />there be better communication between the County and Utilities regarding these <br />types of projects. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuester indicated her concern about involving the residents north <br />of County Road 33 regarding how they will be impacted from the project. <br /> <br />C. County Road 33 East of Highway 169 <br /> <br />Dave Schwarting indicated that discussion should take place regarding the <br />alignment of the road. Discussion was held regarding the "S" curve on County <br /> <br /> <br />