My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
06-08-2010
>
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 11:00:21 AM
Creation date
6/4/2010 3:30:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
6/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMPLEMENTATION <br /> <br />improvements, equipment, or other items located outside o f the TIF district. <br />» Tax increments cannot be used f or these costs i f their purpose is primarily decorative or aesthetic. <br />I f the items serve a f unctional purpose, tax increments can be used unless "their cost is increased <br />by more than ioo percent as a result o f the selection of materials, design, or type as compared <br />with more commonly used materials, designs, or types f or similar improvements, equipment or <br />items". To avoid this restriction, the right-of-way o f street to be improved should be included <br />within the boundaries o f a TIF district. <br />Other Public Finance Tools <br />Although the planning process focused on tax increment financing, it is likely that other <br />public finance tools will be needed to make long term redevelopment investments <br />within the i7~st Avenue FAST. This section highlights potential tools and their <br />application. Additional investigations will be undertaken as finance plans are prepared <br />by specific public improvement and redevelopment projects. <br />Tax Abatement <br />The name "tax abatement" is misleading. No taxes are abated using this tool. In <br />reality, tax abatement functions similar to TIF (see Minnesota Statutes Sections <br />46g.i8iz to 469.i8~5). Each taxing jurisdiction (city, county, school district) has the <br />• ability to levy a property tax equivalent to taxes paid by a parcel of property. The <br />proceeds of this levy can be used to finance any of the public improvements and other <br />redevelopment activities discussed in this plan. Since tax abatement cannot be used <br />for property in a TIF district, the best opportunity for this tool lies with locations that <br />do not qualify for a TIF district. <br />Special Service Districts <br />A special service district has the capacity to finance the construction and maintenance <br />of the public improvements for the ~7~st Avenue FAST. In simplest terms, a special <br />service district is a special taxing district. It allows the City to collect money to support <br />services and improvements in commercial areas. <br />The general statutory authority (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 4z8A) contains few limits <br />on the potential uses of special service districts. The nature of the improvements that <br />can be funded with a special service district are not defined (or limited) by statute. The <br />special service district cannot be used to finance services that the City provides through <br />the general fund throughout Elk River, unless the services are provided at a higher <br />level. The statute does not impose any other limitation on the nature of services. <br />Potential applications of special service districts for implementation of this master <br />plan include: <br />» Construction and maintenance o f streetscape. <br />» Construction and maintenance o f the wetland trails and other public open space. <br />]4 17131. QV2f1lJ2 Focused Area sTudy <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.