My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
06-08-2010
>
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 11:00:21 AM
Creation date
6/4/2010 3:30:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
6/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMPLEMENTATION <br /> <br />increment beyond the boundaries of the TIF district. Items to be funded by TIF must <br />be located within the TIF district or be an amount that falls within pooling limits. <br />For redevelopment TIF districts, not more than z5% of tax increment may be spent <br />outside of the district. The actual application of pooling limits is often more restrictive. <br />Administrative expenses of the TIF district count against the z5% maximum. The <br />amount of revenue available to support eligible costs outside of the district may fall <br />in the 15% to zo% range. <br />Time Constraints: <br />In a perfect world, the City would establish a TIF district and wait for redevelopment. <br />Current State law makes this approach a risky proposition. TIF districts are subject to <br />several time limitations. The most important of these limitations is the five-year rule. <br />After five years from the date of certification of the TI F district, the use of tax increment <br />is subject to new restrictions. Generally, tax increment can only be used to satisfy <br />existing debt and contractual obligations after this date. This rule creates a five year <br />window to make commitments for the use of TI F. Additionally, the geographic area <br />of the TIF district can be reduced, but not enlarged, after five years from the date <br />of certification. Therefore, if a TIF district is established without a specific plan for <br />development, there should be reasonable certainty that development will occur within <br />five years. <br />The City has the ability to decertify all or part of a district and create a new one. This <br />action sets a new five year clock. There is a risk that the conditions used to establish <br />the original district will not be present in the future. <br />Use Limits <br />Several specific statutory limitations will influence the use of tax increments on <br />implementation of the plan. <br />State law requires that at least 90% of revenues from a redevelopment TIF district <br />be used to finance "the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation" of the <br />district. The majority of redevelopment and public improvement expenditures in this <br />plan meet this criteria. Several important limitations must be noted: <br />» Tax increments cannot be used for "a commons area used as a public park". The plan takes a <br />conservative position and assumes that this limitation precludes using TIF for proposed open <br />space improvements. The statute does not define the term "public park". The City may wish <br />to explore this issue with appropriate legal counsel. <br />» Tax increments cannot be used forpublic facilities used for "social, recreational, or con ference" <br />purposes. As with parks, the statute does not de fine these terms. Special rules apply to public <br />• <br />r <br />171St. QV2r1U2 Focused Area STn~i} ]3 ~ j <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.