My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-2022 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2020 - 2029
>
2022
>
06-28-2022 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2022 2:31:47 PM
Creation date
8/2/2022 2:31:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
6/28/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meeting of the <br />Elk River Planning Commission <br />Held at Elk River City Hall <br />Tuesday, June 28, 2022 <br />Members Present: Chair Jill Larson -Vito, Commissioners Perry Beise, Dennis Booth, <br />Eric Johnson, Craig Keisling, Tony Mauren, and Rob Rydberg <br />Members Absent: None <br />Also Present: Councilmember/Liaison Mike Beyer <br />Staff Present: Senior Planner Chris Leeseberg and Sr. Admin. Assistant/Recording <br />Secretary Jennifer Green <br />I. Call Meeting to Order <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Planning <br />Commission was called to order at 6:54 p.m. by Chair Larson -Vito. <br />2. Consider June 28, 2022, Planning Commission Agenda <br />Chair Larson -Vito added item 4. Open Forum to the agenda. <br />Moved by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Keisling to <br />approve the June 28, 2022, Planning Commission agenda with the addition <br />noted above. <br />Motion carried 7-0. <br />3. Consider May 24, 2022, Planning Commission Minutes <br />Moved by Commissioner Beise and seconded by Commissioner Mauren to <br />approve the May 24, 2022, Planning Commission minutes. <br />Motion carried 7-0. <br />4. Open Forum <br />James Sweazey, 18434 Cleveland St. NW, distributed a letter and discussed his <br />concerns with a future development being planned which will surround his property. <br />He was against such high density of homes being proposed next to his property and <br />requested single family homes be situated surrounding his property instead of the <br />proposed townhomes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.