My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RES 20-16
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Resolutions
>
2020 - 2029
>
2020
>
RES 1-24
>
RES 20-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2020 6:24:55 PM
Creation date
3/3/2020 6:24:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
3/2/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of <br />City of Elk River <br />ver City Council <br />Resolution 20-_L6— <br />A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Elk River Supporting <br />Infrastructure Accountability <br />WHEREAS, the development and construction associated with that growth are driving the <br />need for road improvements, street oversizing, street redesign, and street reconstruction; and <br />WHEREAS, municipal statutory authority appropriately exists for fees to support added <br />need for parks, sewer, and water; and <br />WHEREAS, this municipal authority does not exist for infrastructure development fees; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, city streets are one of the four major types of infrastructure local government <br />is responsible to provide to protect public safety and health, and city streets represent a <br />separate but integral piece of the network of roads supporting movement of people and <br />goods; and <br />WHEREAS, existing funding mechanisms, such as Municipal State Aid (MSA), property <br />taxes, and special assessments have limited applications, leaving cities under -equipped to <br />address growing needs; and <br />WHEREAS, neighborhood streets are constructed according to city standards by <br />developers; and <br />WHEREAS, funding sources for larger streets and intersections to support new <br />developments have historically come from infrastructure development fees; and <br />WHEREAS, the Minnesota Supreme Court found in Harstad v. City of Wloodbury that no <br />statutory authority existed for these infrastructure development fees; and <br />WHEREAS, cities should not be forced to make current residents and businesses pay for <br />costs of growth through local taxes but rather by those that are responsible for the growth; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, cities are finding it difficult to develop adequate funding systems to support <br />needed infrastructure development related to growth while complying with existing state <br />statutes; and <br />P 0 2 1 R 1 0 B Y <br />N" ATUR� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.