Laserfiche WebLink
o~ <br />j,EAGUE of <br />[ytINNESOTA <br />CITIES <br />Apri18, 2010 <br />RECEtV ED APR o 91010 <br />Dear Mayors and Chief Appointed Officials: <br />~~a <br />CONNECTING & INNOVATING <br />SINCE 1913 <br />Last week Governor Pawlenty signed into law the first supplemental budget bill, Chapter 215 (HF <br />1671).. This week's Cities Bulletin includes an expanded description of this new law. Among other <br />provisions, it will further reduce Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) and Local Government <br />Aid (LGA) payments by $52.5 million in 2010. This is on top of the $128 million in cuts to those <br />two programs that cities have already taken into account in their adopted 2010 budgets. <br />While these latest cuts are not welcome news, we know the reductions could have been far worse. <br />You may recall that the. Governor initially recommended $125 million in cuts to MVHC and LGA <br />in his supplemental budget proposal while the House Tax Chair introduced a bill that would have <br />cut cities by $115 million. By comparison, the cuts as they currently stand are much less than they <br />might have been. Clearly, our collective efforts to explain the impacts of such deep cuts helped to <br />change minds. If you have not already done so, a "thank you" to those legislators who supported <br />this compromise would be appropriate. <br />However, the signing of Chapter 215 does not. eliminate the possibility of additional cuts for cities <br />in 2010. The Legislature and Governor have yet to agree on the second supplemental budget bill <br />which will affect the education and health and human services budgets. Likewise, Chapter 215 <br />was based on the expectation that the state will receive an additional $400 million in Medicaid <br />assistance from. the federal. government. If the Governor and Legislature cannot agree on the <br />remaining. cuts necessary to balance the budget and/or if the federal Medicaid assistance is not <br />forthcoming, the Legislature will have to revisit its earlier actions and possibly' increase budget <br />cuts already included in Chapter 215. <br />Even cities that no longer receive MVHC and LGA could be affected if the. Legislature considers <br />cuts to other aid and credit programs such as PERApenson aid or police and fire aid, programs <br />that all cities currently receive. That, in fact, has already happened this session; $10.5 million was <br />diverted from the Fire Safety Account, a dedicated source of training dollars for fire departments <br />statewide, as part of Chapter 215. <br />I am, therefore, taking this unusual step of writing to ask that you convey to your legislators the <br />importance of not further reducing city programs - in any form -during the final weeks of the <br />session. Including the cuts authorized in Chapter 215, cities have lost over $300 million in aids <br />since the end of 200$.. And, as it currently stands, the state faces a $5.8 billion. deficit in the next <br />biennium beginning July 1, ZOi 1 meaning the likelihood of even more cuts to these aid programs <br />145 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST rxorrE: (651) 281-1200 FAX: (651) 281-1299 <br />ST. PAUL, MN 55103-2044 rots FREE: (800} 925-1122 WEB: WWW.LMC.ORG <br />