6.2. SR 02-16-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ct~~n a nested Staff and the Plannin Comn~.ssion recommend the City Council adopt ordinance 10-,_._, approving a g zone change from PUD to C3. unnma The a licant is re uestin a zone change from PUD to C3 to allow a commercial use in their building on q g pp arcel "L". This is currentl the site of Flowers Plus. Approximately one half of the building is vacant, p y The a licant desires to rezone them property to allow a new tenant in the vacant portion of the building. pp ~a,~nan ®issi~n ~scuss~®n The commission did a ree that something should be done with the entire PUD, There was discussion on g different avenues that could be utilized to accomplish the intermediate change desired for the subject arcel. one cornmi.ssioner stated it was a step bacl~ward to "spot zone" and felt it should be looked at p more loball , Staff a reed that other approaches could be utilized but felt they would only be a g y g tem ora fix, ne ativel addin to the complex PUD, It was also noted that the city has a zone change p rY g Y g request to act on. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request by a 5-1 vote, ~~~c ~e~t A ro er owner ob'ected to any type of zone change for the subject parcel or the entire PUD, They p p ~' l , also stated their taxes would increase because of the zoning classification being commercial. Staff did contact Sherburne County regarding taxes and values. The County informed staff that the tax classification is based on use, Rezoning from PUD to C-3 will not change the use classification. The valuation of the ro erty is based on comparable sales. Increased sales of properties will influence p p ro er values re ardless of zonin ,The proposed rezoning allows more uses for the subject parcel, ita. p p tY ~ ~ g practice making it more marketable. tc gents Staff report to Planning Commission dated February 9, 2010 ~ ordinance S,~PLANNING MAIN~Case Fiies~ZC~ZC 1a-01 I{la~vers P1us~ZC 10-01~CC,dac