Laserfiche WebLink
City of <br />Elk. <br />River <br />REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />To Item Number <br />Ma or and Ci Council 6.1. <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Public Works Ma 18, 2009 Ter Maurer, Public Works Director <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Resolutions Authorizing the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, and King Lori ohnson, Ci Administrator <br />Avenues Area Street Rehabilitation Project to Proceed Reviewed by <br />Action Requested <br />Consider adoption of the attached four resolutions moving the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King <br />Avenues Area Street Improvement forward. <br />Background/Discussion <br />Earlier in the month, the City Council authorized the preparation of the attached feasibility report <br />for the Norfolk, Morton, Lowell, King Avenues Area Street Improvement after an informational <br />meeting with the affected residents was held. As has previously been discussed with the City <br />Council, this project is on the same schedule as is used for overlay projects. That schedule <br />provides for a public hearing/assessment hearing to be held the same evening after a bid is <br />received for the work so that actual costs and assessments can be discussed at the hearings. <br />The resolutions the Council is asked to consider include: Receiving the Feasibility Study and <br />Ordering the Public Hearing to be held on July 20, 2009; Determinuig the Cost to Be Assessed <br />and Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment Roll; Establishing the Date for the Assessment <br />Hearing to be held also on July 20, 2009; and Ordering the Preparation of Plans and <br />Specifications and Allowing for the Project to be Bid on July 7 so that a firm construction cost <br />will be available on July 20, 2009. <br />Financial Impact <br />The feasibility for the improvement recommends that the assessment cover approximately 50 <br />percent of the cost of the project. There is a mixture of single family homes, townhomes, <br />apartment buildings, and commercial establishments in this project. Single family homes are <br />assessed one unit; townhouses are assessed 0.75 units per dwelling; apartments are assessed 0.25 <br />units per apartment, and the two commercial properties are proposed to be assessed two units <br />each. <br />The finance director has recommended that this project be funded internally through the Street <br />Improvement Reserve fund. <br />Ordering the preparation of plans and specifications and bidding the project will commit the City <br />to engineering expenditures of approximately $17,500 beyond the feasibility costs. <br />