My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. ERMUSR 06-12-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2007
>
06-12-2007
>
6.3. ERMUSR 06-12-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2009 10:25:55 AM
Creation date
3/23/2009 10:25:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
6/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ ~ <br />Elk River ~ w <br />Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Orono Parkway phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Elk River, MN 55330 Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />Notes from June 4, 2007 meeting at Johnson & Condon offices concerning Twin Lakes School <br />proposed irrigation well. <br />Attendees: <br />Shamus O'Meara Attorney for ISD 728 <br />Ron Bratlie ISD 728 <br />Tom Waterius ISD 728 <br />Dale Homuth MN DNR <br />Roger Stradel MN DNR <br />Laurel Reeves MN DNR <br />Dave Neiman MRW <br />Ruth Hubbard MRW <br />Ron Black Attorney for Elk River Municipal Utilities <br />Bryan Adams Elk River Municipal Utilities <br />Roger Renner Renner & Sons <br />Bob Lium Renner & Sons <br />1. O'Meara stated purpose of meeting is to better understand the issues and come to a <br />negotiated resolution without litigation. ISD 728 was planning to submit request for <br />water appropriation to use both wells but delayed for outcome of this meeting. <br />2. With opening comments by Adams and Bratlie, group reviewed Elk River Municipal <br />Utilities letter dated December 20, 2006 and DNR response on December 26, 2006. <br />Adams stated this irrigation well issue started three to four years ago when property was <br />being acquired. Elk River Municipal Utilities letter on August 4, 2006 was discussed, <br />Adams stated this offer was off the table because ISD did not respond, yet proceeded to <br />drill an additional well at Lincoln for irrigation purposes. <br />3. Bratlie implied it was ISD's intent to construct more irrigation wells as a cost saving <br />measure instead of paying higher water rates. <br />4. All agreed ISD can do a better job of following sprinkling restrictions and use moisture <br />meters to help reduce irrigation needs. <br />5. City and Utility ordinance was discussed. ISD is not convinced City can preclude them <br />from utilizing a well. (Language is weak, again verify with Peter Beck.) <br />6. DNR &MRW commended on requirements of wellhead protection plan. DNR stated <br />ISD's proposed wells will influence the municipal well. Due to Elk River having only <br />one aquifer, they are correct in being protective of this water source. <br />7. DNR commented on Elk River conservation plan and Elk River is carrying forward the <br />DNR request to promote conservation through rates. DNR stated that Elk River's 10 year <br />appropriation will carry a requirement to monitor Mt Simon aquifer with test wells. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.