My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. ERMUSR 05-10-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2007
>
05-10-2007
>
5.3. ERMUSR 05-10-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2009 3:47:04 PM
Creation date
3/20/2009 3:47:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
5/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
// <br />Elk River <br />Municip al Utilitie s <br />13069 Orono Parkway <br />F.lk River, MN 55330 <br />May 1, 2007 <br />To: Elk River Municipal Utilities commission <br />Jerry Takle <br />Jim Tralle <br />Jerry Gumphrey <br />From: Theresa Slominski <br />Subject: Health Care Savings Plan update <br />phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />At the last commission meeting, staff was asked to seek out alternatives to the HCSP <br />presented, to see if there is a comparable product out there that doesn't have mandatory <br />participation as a requirement. A review of alternative products is attached, and, <br />unfortunately, there is not a truly comparable product available. The alternatives most <br />closely resembling the HCSP product are HSAs and VEBAs but they are both tied to a <br />high deductible health insurance plan. Annuities are an option, but they do not represent <br />the same tax savings since they are taxable upon distribution, regardless of the use of the <br />funds distributed. <br />This information was brought forward to the task group, and after review, it was <br />determined that the HCSP is still the best product for setting aside funds to use for health <br />care costs after retirement. It was noted that for the employees that said no, it was most <br />likely not because they are against the contribution rates now, but that they are concerned <br />about down the road if employees want to set up groups with higher contribution rates. It <br />was also noted that there would still need to be dialogue before any additional groups <br />would be set up in the future. <br />The policy manual language drafted and presented last commission meeting is included <br />again. Staff recommends adopting the HCSP as presented. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.