Laserfiche WebLink
Item # 6.1. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf, Building and <br />Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />DATE: March 17, 2003 ~/~. <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br /> for Schmidt Gravel Mine <br /> <br />Included in your packet is a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) <br />for the Schmidt Gravel Mine project. This was not a mandatory EAW, but rather was <br />done at the discretion of the petitioner. The purpose of the EAW is to describe the project <br />and gather information to identify any potential environmental effects. <br /> <br />For this EAW, the City Council for the City of Elk River is the Responsible <br />Governmental Unit (RGU) charged with determining from the information gathered <br />through the EAW process, whether or not this project has significant potential to cause <br />irreversible environmental effects. If the Council feels there is a significant potential to <br />cause irreversible environmental effects, they shall order an Environmental Impact <br />Statement (EIS) be prepared for the project. To make their decision the Council will <br />consider the following information: the EAW itself, comments received on the EAW, and <br />the responses to the comments received. The Planning Commission reviewed the <br />pertinent information concerning the EAW and they are not recommending the <br />preparation of an EIS. <br /> <br />The Council shall order an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared, if they <br />determine that the impacts that may reasonably be expected by the project have the <br />potential for significant environmental effects. The Council shall consider the impacts of <br />the project under the following criteria: <br />· type, extent, and reversibility of the environmental effects; <br />· cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects; <br />· the extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing <br /> public regulatory authority; and <br />· the extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result <br /> of other environmental studies. <br /> <br /> RESPONSE TO COMMENTS <br />The following are staff's responses to comments received on the EAW: <br /> <br />Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) - letter dated February 12, 2003 <br />from Kathleen A. Wallace. <br /> <br />Comments - No objection as long as Blanding's Turtle guidelines are adhered to and an <br />enforceable reclamation plan is developed. <br /> <br /> <br />