Laserfiche WebLink
~i <br />Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN 55330-0430 <br />December 1, 2008 <br />To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />Jerry Takle <br />John Dietz <br />Jerry Gumphrey <br />From: Troy Adams <br />Subject: Clothing Policy <br />Phone: ?63.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />Recently, there have been some questions by staff regarding Elk River Municipal Utilities <br />clothing policies pertaining to meter change out and their impact to employee safety. <br />At the April 17, 2008 Elk River Municipal Utilities Meeting, the commission reviewed and <br />approved changes to ERMU Policy Manual Section 7.1 -Clothing Policy and ERMU Employee <br />Handbook Section 30 -Employee Clothing (both attached for reference). The changes to both <br />documents resulted from an analysis of the arc flash assessment that had just been completed by <br />USG. Based on the results of the arc flash assessment and an effort to reduce operational costs, <br />delineation was drawn between the ERMU outside operation employees that work around <br />energized electrical equipment and those who don't. Per the approved changes to the ERMU <br />Handbook Section 30, the outside operation employees that do not work around energized <br />electrical equipment would not receive fire retardant clothing. Also, short sleeve shirts would be <br />substituted for pants. In the approved changes to the Clothing Policy under item #6, the 8 calorie <br />clothes system is not required for residential meter change out. <br />For many reasons, it makes sense to consider having one clothing system for all outside <br />employees. Currently, ERMU employees that do not receive the 8 calorie fire retardant clothing <br />system change out residential electric meters on a regular basis. There is also the possibility that <br />any ERMU employee may need to work around energized electrical equipment, even if it's only <br />in an all-hands-on-deck situation. The risks of arc flash are obviously less with the reduced <br />frequency of exposure, but the fact is the risks are still there. Also to consider, the costs of the 8 <br />calorie clothes system are more than the non fire retardant clothing. So there needs to be some <br />balance between risk and cost. At present time, there are 17 employees that receive the 8 calorie <br />clothes system and 7 employees that receive the non fire retardant clothes. Attached are current <br />prices for both clothing systems for your reference and consideration. <br />