Laserfiche WebLink
City <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Item # 6. I. <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Co~cil ~ <br /> <br />Michele McPhersdl~_~Director <br /> <br />of Planning <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />March I I, 2002 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Request by Mike Jones for Variance - Case No. V 01-08 <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br /> March 6, 2002 Memorandum from Peter Beck, City Attorney <br /> Resolution 02- <br />· January 22, 2002 City Council Minutes <br />· Staff report <br /> <br />Analysis <br /> <br />Per the City Council's direction on January 22, 2002 the City Attorney has reviewed the <br />request by Mike Jones to allow slopes greater than 3:1 without a retaining wall. As Mr. Beck <br />points out in his memo, it is possible for the City Council to grant the variance with <br />conditions. He recommends that the Council approve a detailed resolution (attached) for <br />which outlines the conditions that must be met. The resolution would be recorded against <br />the property with the variance action. <br /> <br />The Council may want to change the resolution as the time lines contained within are <br />relatively short and only allows one growing season for the establishment of the vegetation. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The Board of Adjustments and staff have recommended that the Council deny the variance <br />request. If the resolution addresses the concerns of the Council to grant the variance, staff <br />recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution, require the applicant to sign it, and <br />authorize staff to record it with the variance action against the property. <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\V 01-08 Jones\3-11StaffReport.doc <br /> <br /> <br />