Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />City of Elk River <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date <br />Communi Develo ment Februa 20,2007 <br />Item Description <br />193rd Avenue Improvement-Public Hearing <br />· Resolution Ordering the Project Memorandum and <br />Preparation of Plans and Specifications <br />· Resolution Authorizing Eminent Domain and <br />Acquisition of Real Property in Accordance with <br />Minnesota Statutes Cha ter 117 <br /> <br />Item Number <br />6.1. <br />Prepared by <br />Ter Maurer, Ci <br />Reviewed by <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction <br />As the City Council is aware, a public hearing for the consideration of an eminent domain <br />resolution for the 193rd Avenue Corridor has been scheduled for this evening's City Council <br />meeting. A public hearing is not necessary, but Staff believes that it is important to let any <br />affected property owner be heard. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />At the public hearing, I will have a brief presentation concerning detailed information regarding <br />the proposed takings from the properties involved in the 193rd Avenue Corridor. Howard Roston <br />will also be in attendance to give the City Council a more detailed description of the eminent <br />domain process. Both of us will be available to answer questions at the public hearing. <br /> <br />At the public hearing held on January 16, 2007 to consider the alignment of the 193rd Avenue <br />Corridor, I was asked to bring back more specific information regarding what the new 193rd <br />Avenue Corridor may look like in construction, and also to comment on improvements needed to <br />the existing 193rd Avenue roadway. Although we have not been authorized to enter into final <br />design, we do have some conceptual ideas about what the design would look like. We are <br />envisioning a parkway, much like Orono Parkway right outside City Hall; a median dividing the <br />two lanes of approximately 16 - 18 feet in width. This would allow for the insertion of left turn <br />lanes wherever needed, without moving the thru lanes. Each thru-Iane would be approximately <br />22 feet wide. This would allow for one lane of traffic and enough room that a disabled vehicle <br />could pull to the shoulder and other traffic could continue to move by, or in the case of a right <br />turn opportunity, that a slight widening of the road could interject a right turn lane, allowing <br />traffic to free-flow by the turning vehicle. As with other major corridors in the City, we envision <br />pedestrian facilities on both sides. One side is typically a 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk and the <br />other side is typically a 10-foot wide bituminous pathway. The 100-foot wide right-of-way would <br />allow for a boulevard area separating the pedestrian movements from the traffic movements. <br />However, in areas of wedands, topography or major vegetation, the final design would attempt to <br />minimize the roadway footprint by moving the pedestrian facilities closer to the curb and gutter. <br />Also, while crossing the wedands, it may be possible to narrow the median to minimize the <br />wedand disruption. <br />