Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Item # 6.5. & 6.6. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: Scott Clark, Community Development Director <br /> <br />DATE: July I 0, 2006 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Planning Items <br /> <br />Tllis Inemoralldulll covers agellda itelns 6.5 and 6.6 and SOllle additional planning item <br />discussion points. <br /> <br />Item 6.5-Discussion on the "4 for 40" provision of the Zoning Ordinance, and its <br />extension (e.g." 8 for 80") was directed to the work session by the Council after action on <br />tIle Carverwood Hills prelilnillary plat. Attached are nlenlOS from the City Attorney and <br />the COUI1Cil actioll page fro In tile May 1, 2006 llleeting regarding the same. <br /> <br />Item 6.6- The PlaI1l1iIlg COlllll1ission discussed several items at their June work session, <br />includillg reglllatiol1S 011 above ground pools and temporary signs. <br /> <br />Above grOUlld pools - with tile illcreased nlarket sales of above ground pools staff <br />has had public inquiries regardiIlg wlletller tIle City regulates their installation. At <br />this time, the State buildillg regulations require a permit for pools above 24" <br />inches in heigIlt and City ordinance states that if a permit is required, then a fence <br />I1eeds to be constlucted except for pools that are 48" inches or higher (the <br />apparent assumption is that the pool walls operate as the fence). The Planning <br />Conunissiol1 was of tI1e OpiIlion tllat a fence should not be required si11ce tIle <br />pennitting allows the City to 4 ensure that other safety features can be put into <br />affect suell as removable ladders, fold-up ladders, etc. Also attached is tIle <br />Planning Con1lllission staffreport tI1at will be reviewed at their July 11, 2006 <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Temporary signs - the City Council has asked that the Planning Commission <br />review the Ordinal1ce's provisions regarding temporary signs as these types of <br />signs have almost become "permanent" in some parts of the community. One of <br />the issues is tllat tIle currellt Ordinallce allows an individual bllsiness, as opposed <br />