04-29-1974 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY PLANNING, ELK RIVER MINN. April 29th, 1974. Hearing on the preliminary. plat of Village Estate~s 2nd .addition in Sec. 30, Tpw. 33, Rng. 26 (Gary SantwifeI. Plat consists of one block with l8 lots allover 1 acre. No access to County road 35 except on Xerxes Street. The question of dedication of land or payment of cash for park purposes was considered and is was M.S.C. that the plat be approved as presented with the request to the County Planning COmmission that either 10 per cent of the land or 10 per cent of the cash value of ~he lots sold be turned over to the Park Board for used by it to purchase land for the park system. Hearing held at 8:00 P.M. on Apr. 29th, 1974 according to duly published notice f~r a variance to construct a warehouse on the property of the Central Lumber Co. mn Block 23 of the Village of Elk River. Only one comment from the public that it be so placed as not to blockthe view from XHRxR*xK Mr. Pink's house. The building to be pole barn type with galvanized siding. To be 75 by 52 plus 12 footlean to . To be placed in the South East corner of the property. The area is zoned C-3 (office Buiading) M.S.C.tm grant the variance with a 5 foot set back on the East and a 10 foot setback on the south, and with the proviso that no further expansion on that site be made in the future. It was M.S.C. to schedule a hearing for a change of the Zoning Ordinance to Adopt a street plan for the area between the R.R. tract and Scholl Street and between Jackson and Proctor, to be held at the May meeting on Wed. May 29th. A request for a recomendation from the pl~~ning commission concerning the vacation of a street on the North and East side of Block Block l of w. H. Houltons Addition to the Village of Elk RIver. Made by Flora Martin, the owner of Lot 25 of Aud"~ S1.ib~ No.3, in said Village of Elk River r which Lot abutts a portion of said street on the north, Was considered. It was pointed out that the road also serves land owned by the Burlington Northern Roalroad, and was presently useful for access to that land. It was also pointed out that this land may ~~ll be needed in the exp~~sion tor imp~oy~ent of U.s. "Highways lO and 52 if the p~o~osed plan for trq!+C ~eyepatipn tn that ~rea is carried out. It was M.S.C. that the planning commissiun reccommend that the street bshould not be vacated. ~€iThe. f~~l h'evoJ;'t ~fJ.a. mapS' conceJ:?n.t:n~ the s.t1).d~{ for the. ezpansion of the Village l~its by planned ap~exation, by annexation without plan or by consolidation, etc. It was suggested that before any further action was taken that a joint meeting with the County planning, the TO~~snip ana the Village be had to explain the various possibilities.