My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-04-1966 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1965 - 1969
>
1966
>
11-04-1966 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:54 AM
Creation date
4/7/2006 3:21:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
11/4/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.. ... ,~ ~,. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MINUTES FOR ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Individuals Usually <br />Attending: <br /> <br />Dan Bailey <br />Al Bailey <br />Le s Derr <br />Dick Gongoll <br />Hilmer Bartelt <br />John MacGibbon <br />Paul Siegler <br /> <br />Meeting: <br /> <br />November 4, 1966 <br /> <br />In Attendance: <br /> <br />Dan Bailey <br />Al Bailey <br />Hilmer Bm-telt <br />Dick Gongoll <br />John MacGibbon <br />Paul Siegler <br /> <br />Also JimKnight from the Planning Consultants <br /> <br />We reviewed a propo sal for a change of zoning on Highwa y # 169 and Main <br />Street. The planner feels the use of property should be restricted to <br />highway related business. There was discussion of the possibility of <br />changing the zoning ordinance to require comprehensive plot plan as part <br />of special use permit. <br /> <br />Planner does not recommend strict commercial development which is <br />essentially what is being asked for in the petition. <br /> <br />On the subject of proposed change in zoning of area at Northeast corner of <br />Highway #169 and Main Street from part multiple dwelling and part single <br />family residents to an R -C district. There are the following considerations: <br /> <br />1. A change of zoning does not guarantee the development of any additional <br />businesses. <br /> <br />2. The planning firm retained by the village does not recommend strict <br />commerical development along the highway. This essentially the <br />plan now under consideration. <br /> <br />3. The planning commission is not negative to the zoning change in this <br />area but feels more control should be built in to any change. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />To further this idea, the commission proposes to work out language for <br />an ordinance change which would allow tying a comprehensive plot plan <br />for a general development plan to such a zoning change. <br /> <br />The village council recently referred a zoning change request to the planning <br />commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.