My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ERMU RES 24-6
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Resolutions
>
2024
>
ERMU RES 24-6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2024 9:28:46 AM
Creation date
4/15/2024 11:21:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUR
date
4/9/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 24-6 <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL <br />UTILITIES AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF SUBSTATION RECLOSERS <br />WHEREAS, Elk River Municipal Utilities (ERMU) has developed plans, specifications and <br />bid documents for the purchase of twenty-six (26) substation reclosers; and <br />WHEREAS, on March 9th, 2024 ERMU advertised for bids for twenty-six (26) substation <br />reclosers; and <br />WHEREAS, the bid advertisement sought bids for substation reclosers but not <br />controllers; and <br />WHEREAS, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law on April 2, 2024; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, a total of 2 bids were received for the project as follows: <br />WESCO's ABB OVR ("Wesco") bid for twenty-six (26) reclosers was $507,910.00; <br />and Border States' Eaton NOVA ("Border State") bid for twenty-six (26) reclosers <br />was $565,576.44; and <br />WHEREAS, both bidders are deemed to be responsible bidders; and <br />WHEREAS, WESCO's bid materially deviated from the plans and specifications in the bid <br />advertisement as it provided a recloser that is not compatible with ERMU's existing <br />controllers as required by the specifications and not in conformity with the provided <br />specifications, and is, therefore, not a responsive bid; and <br />WHEREAS, Border States' bid included an extraneous quote for a controller, which was <br />not requested in ERMU's specifications; and <br />WHEREAS, ERMU does find that Border States' deviation is not material as the <br />controller quote is separate from the recloser quote and ERMU shall award the contract <br />solely on the basis of the recloser bid; and <br />230591v1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.