Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Action <br />To Item Number <br />Ma Tor and CinT Council 7.2a <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Public Hearings May 2, 2022 Chris Leeseberg, Senior Planner <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Land Use Amendment: Daniel Kruger, PID# Zack Carlton, Communit�r Develo ment Director <br />75-871-0105, Single Fami1�T Residential to iVlixed Reviewed by <br />Residential Neighborhood, Cal Portner, Ci r Administrator <br />Action Requested <br />Adopt, byT motion, a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan to <br />change the land use guidance from Traditional Single-Family <br />Residential to iVlixed Residential. <br />Background/Discussion <br />Case No. LU 22-01 <br />The propertyr is currently zoned R-1b and the recentlyr adopted <br />Comprehensive Plan guides the propertyT for Traditional Single-Family <br />Residential. The applicant is requesting a Land Use Amendment to <br />amend to guidance for iVlixed Residential, as well as a Zone Change <br />(ZC 22-03) to construct a four-unit multi-familyT residential structure. <br />The one-acre subject site is located at the northwest inteYsection of <br />185`�' Avenue and TYoy Street (private Yoad). <br />� <br />� <br />RR <br />a r+Wy i o <br />Figure I <br />� <br />� <br />3 <br />x <br />f <br />� � � <br />. t <br />CR 33 <br />i <br />CR 12 <br />�P <br />�w� <br />�O <br />% <br />69 <br />Planning Commission <br />Landform spoke on behalf of the applicant and noted that the <br />application is very similar to the concept plan reviewed byT the <br />commission earlier in the yTear and described the benefits that future <br />development will have as a Yesult of the seweY and wateY extension. <br />TheyT also noted a second easement, required by ERIVIU, will be <br />recorded as part of the project Staff has not received anyT comments <br />since the commission meeting. <br />At the April 18, 2022, Cit�T Council meeting, the neighbor directl�T to the north opposed four units and does not <br />want four homes looking directly into his back yard and preferred it to be single familyT. The propertyT owner at the <br />end of Salem Street questioned access on Tro�T Street and indicated access cannot occur off Salem Street without <br />removing man�T structures. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions or concerns about the request and unanimouslyT recommended <br />approval. <br />The Elk River Vision <br />A 2a�elcolning co�nlnunity 2a�ith T evolutiona� y and spizzted T esou� cefulness, exceptional <br />se�vice, and coln�nunity engagelnent that encou�ages and ins�iz•es pTo�pe�zty. <br />PowEREo ar <br />�I'1 ���� <br />Up�iited.• August 2020 <br />