Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Elk River Vision <br />A welcoming community with revolutionary and spirited resourcefulness, exceptional <br />service, and community engagement that encourages and inspires prosperity <br />Request for Action <br /> <br /> <br />To <br />Parks and Recreation Commission <br />Item Number <br />6.2 <br />Agenda Section <br />Discussion <br />Meeting Date <br />May 6, 2019 <br />Prepared by <br />Michael Hecker, Parks and Recreation Director <br />Item Description <br />Field Allocation Policy <br />Reviewed by <br />Cal Portner, City Administrator <br />Reviewed by <br /> <br /> <br />Action Requested <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Background/Discussion <br />The Parks and Recreation Commission held a joint meeting with the Elk River Youth Sports Commission <br />on May 1, 2019 to discuss the Field Allocation Policy. The highlights of the policy were discussed and <br />members of the Commission were requested to review and provide feedback to staff by June 1, 2019. <br /> <br />It was asked by a few members if the residency percentage of 80% could be lowered because some of the <br />group representatives felt memberships were close, but not exact. It was then asked what percentage <br />would be effective to make sure Elk River associations receive first priority. One suggestion is to look at <br />what Elk River High School has for a residency percentage and possibly use that for the policy priority. <br /> <br />Staff is researching on what that number could be for the high school. What is the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission feedback on a policy for group priority? Should 80% be lowered? <br /> <br /> <br />Financial Impact <br />N/A <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> Field Allocation Policy Manual Section VII. Priority Group Classifications