My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.8 ERMUSR 10-11-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2005
>
10-11-2005
>
5.8 ERMUSR 10-11-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2019 1:12:32 PM
Creation date
8/6/2018 11:28:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
10/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 16 <br /> Elk River <br /> I Municipal Utilities <br /> 13069 Orono Parkway phone: 763.441.2020 <br /> Elk River,MN 55330 Fax 763 4418099 <br /> ' October 4, 2005 <br /> ' To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> .ferry Takle <br /> John Dietz <br /> Jim Tralle <br /> From: Bryan Adams <br /> Subject: 4th Engine/Generator at Landfill <br /> ' As you are aware, we are pursuing the installation of the 4th engine/generator at the Elk <br /> River Landfill. The cost of this addition is estimated to be $650,000. <br /> N The air permit application has been submitted to the MPCA. Preliminary indications are <br /> they desire further study which takes more time. Our consultants feel the outcome will <br /> not change and a permit will be issued. The Elk River Landfill is also applying for a <br /> ' landfill expansion permit, and the MPCA is apparently having difficulty keeping these <br /> two permit applications separate. <br /> In the process of negotiation with Waste Management, it is apparent they desire more <br /> payment for their gas to cover their increased cost. We subsequently ask Great River <br /> Energy if the wholesale purchase power price will increase for the 4`h unit. They in <br /> response, increased the payment for the 4`h engine which increases the revenue by <br /> approximately $1,538,000 over the remaining 16 years of the purchase power contract. <br /> The issue now at hand is how we distribute these extra funds back to the 3 parties of <br /> Waste Management, Elk River Municipal Utilities and Sherburne County in an equitable <br /> fashion. The attached financial pro-forms reflect projected revenue costs and <br /> distribution. Description of these pro-forms is as follows: <br /> ' Line 12 Existing purchase price of energy <br /> y <br /> ' Line 35 Proposed purchase price of energy <br /> Line 37 Net difference in revenue to be distributed after appropriate expenses <br /> have been increased due to addition of 4`h' unit. <br /> ' Line 41 Increase in revenue to Waste Management through <br /> higher gas price total increase $595,589 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.