Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />-.., <br /> <br />REGULAR SEMI-MONTHLY MEETING OF THE <br />ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL <br />HELP AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY <br />:AUGUST 23, 1982 <br /> <br />Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Schuldt, Engstrom. Toth and Duitsman <br /> <br />Members Absent: None <br /> <br />1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle. <br /> <br />2. Agenda <br /> <br />Item 14-F, Equipment Certificates, was added to the August 23, 1982 City Council <br />Agenda. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN ENGSTROM MOVED TO IAPPROVE THE AUGUST 23, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS <br />AMENDED. COUNCILMAN DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />3. Minutes <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle asked for minute updates on the regularly scheduled City Council <br />workshop sessions. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN TOTH MOVED TO.APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 9, 1982 CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING. COUNCILMANSCHULDr SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />4. Open Mike <br /> <br />No one appeared for this item. <br /> <br />5. Referendum for Acquisition of the Water Department <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated that at a committee meeting on July 26, 1982, the question <br />of the acquisition of the water department from the Municipal Utilities was dis- <br />cussed and that it was the consensus of the City Council that the first opportunity <br />at which a full City Council could be present, the matter should be placed on the <br />City Council's agenda for a final determination by the Council. Mayor Hinkle indi- <br />cated that it is the City Council's responsibility to approve of bonding for the <br />City of Elk River, and also the future planning of the City. Mayor Hinkle indicated <br />that at the present time, the City has staff people that can provide the inspection <br />requirements necessary for the water d~partment and further indicated that many <br />other cities have their water department and sewer department as a joint operation. <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt the Utilities Commission has done a good job <br />with the operation of the Elk Riv~r Utilities, but further indicated that he felt the <br />Utilities Commission has not provided the future planning nec~ssary for the water <br />department. Mayor Hinkle indicated that the City Council has prompted the current <br />water study to be completed. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that he felt the opera- <br />tion of the water department in conjunction with the sewer department could provide <br />a smoother op~ration and at a lesser cost. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt the <br />City Council should authorize the question regarding the jurisdiction of the water <br />department to be placed on the general election ballot and therefore, let the voters <br />make the decision. <br />