Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL <br />HELD AT ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY <br />MONDAY, .IANUARY 6, 1992 <br /> <br />MEMRER~ PRE8ENT: <br /> <br />MAyor Tra 1 1 e, COlmcl 1 members ~r-hu] dt, Hol mgren, Dietz, <br />Rnd Kropuenske <br /> <br />MEMRF.R~ ABSF.NT: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />~TAFF PRE8F:NT: <br /> <br />Patrick KIaers, City Administrator; Stephen Rohlf, <br />fulilding and Zoning Administrator; Lori Johnson, Finanr-e <br />Direr-tor; and ~andrR Thackeray, City Clerk <br /> <br />1. f,fl.ll Meet i ne: to Ord~r.: <br /> <br />Pursuant. to due call and noticf' thereof, thf' meeting of the Elk Rivp.r <br />City Counci 1 was r-alled to order at 6:~0 p.m. by Mayor TraUe. <br /> <br />2 . PJ~l!!lj n~_ C9..!1l-.miB~i!1JLlD.:t~r_~Li ew~ <br /> <br />Mayor Tral Ie indicat.ed that there were three positions vacant on the <br />Planning Commission and that six canelidates had applied t.o fill the <br />Planning Commission vacancles. <br /> <br />Thf' City Counci 1 interviewed the following candidates for the Planning <br />Commission: Rohert Minton, .Tames Fil ipovich, Dan Tveite, Louis <br />Kuester, Robert Bischoff, and Mary Eberley. <br /> <br />Following t.he interviews, Councl lmember Holmgren noted, and the City <br />Council concurr(~d, that. thp. pp.ople intp.rviewed were An ontstanding <br />group of r-andidates. <br /> <br />The Counci I recesserl at 7: 4fi II. m. and reconvent=~d at 7: fiO p. m. <br /> <br />~. r;0.n8.ut~_r__JlBL}!2_r,it.~r:!:)1IlJrJl_~gf:}1d1! <br /> <br />Item R.l.n. Rui lding Permit Fees ami 8.12 Letter to Industrial <br />Prospect.s wp.re added t.o the agenda. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMRER. SCmJLDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE 1/6/92 COUNCIL AGENDA AS <br />AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUEN~KE SECONDF.D THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED n-O. <br /> <br />4. 1. Con~Ldp:F_Jj)jJ_!iL}!LJ!j.ty C01.lllG5l!Um!t!l5- <br /> <br />COUNCILMRMBER KROPlJft:NSKE MOVl<:D TO APPROVE THE 10/15/91 CITY COUNCIL <br />MINUTES AS ~URMITTF.D. COUNCTLMEMRER ~CHlJLDT SECONDF.D THE MOTION. THE <br />MOTION CARRIED fi-O. <br /> <br />4.2. .G9nBj~er L2.Llf.j_~1-S.J:t.L.Q01!ncU-1.1inJJt~'i <br /> <br />Discussion was helel pertaining to Item 6.3. Zoning Interpretation of <br />proposed ORtrich farm. The Council diRcllsseo the fourth paragraph <br />limier 6.3 wh i ch stated that j t waR the COnSp.nRUS of the COllnc i 1 that <br />OstriclwR IlP. consider'{~rJ wi 3d animals by nnture ano not be al lowed as UIl <br />agricultural IISf~. COllnci Imemher Schuldt amI Kropuenske indicated that <br />