Laserfiche WebLink
Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br /> TO: FROM: <br /> Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Theresa Slominski—Finance and Office <br /> John Dietz, Chair Manager <br /> Allan Nadeau, Vice-Chair <br /> Daryl Thompson, Trustee <br /> MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br /> July 14, 2015 5.2 <br /> SUBJECT: <br /> Second Quarter Delinquent Items <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> Second quarter delinquent items are presented for your review. We have previously reported on <br /> four different categories of delinquents as follows: <br /> • Assessments are delays in collecting the money owed and is assessed to the property <br /> taxes in the fall. <br /> • Collections amounts are those we send to the collection agency to try and collect after <br /> we have exhausted all our internal collection efforts. <br /> • Revenue Recapture (RR) is the program through the state where funds are collected <br /> from individuals' tax refunds and remitted to us,with the balance (if any) remitted to <br /> the individual. It presents an opportunity to collect funds rather than resorting to a <br /> collection agency or having to write them off completely. <br /> • Write Offs are amounts removed from the books with no further collection efforts <br /> being extended. <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> Previously,we were able to provide a report individually identifying each of the customers' <br /> written off. This was not the ideal report to present because of its volume and limitations of <br /> customer data per State Statute 13.685, but it was the only report we had and we made it work. <br /> We are still working with NISC to create a process for writing off accounts that separates those <br /> for assessment in the fall, and those submitted to revenue recapture. Once that is complete,we <br /> will work with NISC to create reports for internal use and commission presentation. In the <br /> interim,this process is entirely manual but please note that it is still occurring. <br /> I have for review the color-coded recap comparisons with last year, identifying the four <br /> categories and the running totals. When comparing the far right totals columns for 2014 and <br /> 2015, note that we have a larger amount for 2015. The difference is in the amounts for RR, <br /> because the prior year amount is reduced by amounts collected and we are only showing <br /> IM <br /> PA � ER 1' <br /> Page 1 of 2 E <br /> Reliable Public <br /> Power Provider P O W E R E D To S£R V£ <br /> 53 <br />