My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. HRSR 01-28-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
01-28-2002
>
6.0. HRSR 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2015 2:29:28 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
1/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 6. <br /> • <br /> City of <br /> Elk <br /> River <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Economic Development Authority <br /> Housing & Redevelopment Authority <br /> Mayor & City Council <br /> FROM: Catherine Mehelich, Director of Economic Development <br /> DATE: January 14, 2002 <br /> SUBJECT: NE Corner of Hwy 169 & Main Street Redevelopment Update <br /> Attachments <br /> * Court of Appeals overturns Walser district court decision,LMC, Nov. 21,2001. <br /> • * TIF still viable tool, but court decision is warning to cities,MN Real Estate Journal, Dec. 10,2001 <br /> Issue <br /> Developer, Kraus-Anderson Realty,has been considering a redevelopment of the NE <br /> Corner of Hwy 169 &Main Street since Spring 2001. The developer has suggested <br /> consideration of tax increment finance assistance from the City to fund extra-ordinary costs, <br /> such as acquisition and demolition, related to completing a redevelopment project. <br /> Background <br /> In September 2001 the developer submitted a preliminary site plan for staff review. The <br /> proposed redevelopment area included the former Ron's Foods, City Emporium, and two <br /> adjacent apartment buildings along Third Street. When asked to consider the use of TIF, the <br /> HRA, EDA and City Council members strongly suggested that the developer also consider <br /> including the adjacent single family homes located to the north for a larger redevelopment <br /> concept. The developer indicated to staff a willingness to consider the larger area,but again <br /> noted the importance of the City's consideration of tax increment financing for the larger <br /> project. <br /> One of the first steps in evaluating the proposed redevelopment project for tax increment <br /> financing is a "structurally substandard" finding required by statute. Staff offered to <br /> complete an initial assessment of the proposed redevelopment area for its eligibility. The <br /> City Building Official reported that based upon past inspections and knowledge of the <br /> properties that there is "minimal structural deterioration", not considering building or energy <br /> code compliance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.