My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. HRSR 03-01-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03-01-2004
>
5.2. HRSR 03-01-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2015 4:36:55 PM
Creation date
6/4/2015 4:36:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
3/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ITEM 1 5.2. <br /> �j <br /> • ' <br /> City of <br /> Elk -�-� <br /> River <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Housing & Redevelopment Authority <br /> ors <br /> FROM: Heidi Steinmetz, Assistant Director of Economic Development <br /> DATE: March I, 2004 <br /> SUBJECT: Downtown Property and Business Owner Feedback <br /> Attachments <br /> • Memo from Jim Prosser, Ehlers &Associates, dated January 27, 2004 <br /> • DRAFT Rivers Edge Downtown Business Association Minutes, December 10,2003 <br /> and January 14, 2004 <br /> • Issue <br /> Twenty one-to-one meetings with approximately thirty-five downtown property and <br /> business owners took place during the month of January and February. Jim Prosser of <br /> Ehlers and Associates and Chris Leeseberg, City Planner conducted most of the meetings. <br /> The purpose of the meetings was to gather additional input on the Downtown Revitalization <br /> Project and particularly parking options from the downtown property and business owners. <br /> The meetings were an additional tool used to communicate the project to the public. <br /> The attached memo from Jim Prosser summarizes the results of the property and business <br /> owner feedback gathered during the January one-to-one meetings. Five meetings were held <br /> in February. Most of the feedback was consistent with the January meetings with the <br /> exception of the below two issues. <br /> • A few business owners mentioned a concern for their employees' safety in walking <br /> to/from the recommended surface parking lot behind the Brick Block. One <br /> business owner requested "extra" lighting be installed in the lot. <br /> • The City should continue to explore additional parking options with the School <br /> District. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.