Laserfiche WebLink
ITEM 14. <br /> • <br /> �'R?rps'rc�.�.. '++'++Q7T� n+, pso.nr,.y�P�faT++.7CS' ro -.i + -7!", a -s +,C,.Y,- r_ <br /> 7 h d W1 b.4 \:< -"iil'K' .._. +Z �. i f +Z' .,4,';4,'-',. 2z F Y F <br /> +,2 t , i sir r. .i�.`4'� -tr...;o•r ,c,4''',--i'`4'4.! -c �: .., ` 'r -,t",-.F4} tr,:.�` ? a `- t i.. <br /> ,.:--,1-,.,: 't vim_ ;;�_. 3 -° ,++. *a1... <br /> 1 <br /> Cl't); of u <br /> alo <br /> Newsletter <br /> Besi 0 <br /> Survey Results Are In <br /> The survey is complete. The results are Most respondents were from the 36- <br /> 3., in. Some of you asked for a timely re- 50 age bracket with families of 3-5 <br /> • port of these results. Well here it is. Out and live north of highway 55. The <br /> of 4,848 mailed surveys, we received other large respondent group were <br /> 1 responses from 602 of you. That is seniors with one or two in the family. <br /> i roughly a 15%response rate. An inter- The count went like this: <br /> I esting consideration is that the national Age Distribution <br /> t, <br /> -1; average response rate on surveys that 18-24 4.5% <br /> provide an incentive(i.e.a$2.00 credit 25-35 25.7% <br /> on utility bills)with postage prepaid is 36-50 35.9% <br /> 1 35%. What does it mean that our city 50+ 31.7% <br /> I residents responded less than the na- NA 2.2% <br /> tional average? We really don't know continued on page 2 <br /> the answer to that one. <br /> The following is a summary of the re- <br /> sponses for each question and the de- °-,.. ; t r <br /> mographic information on the respon- j' <br /> dents. We received a lot of creative so- <br /> lutions that are just too numerous to <br /> mention,but are sure to receive consid- <br /> eration. Several of you had suggestions <br /> that were specific and easily solved. <br /> Some of these, we have already taken <br /> action on. The "NA" category on each <br /> question are those that didn't answer that �'"' <br /> question. <br /> IFirst,a little about the respondents. <br /> rf n„ , , <br />