My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. ERMUSR 10-21-2014
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2014
>
10-21-2014
>
5.2. ERMUSR 10-21-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2014 9:49:33 AM
Creation date
10/20/2014 3:30:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
10/21/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />Wage and Benefits Committee: <br />John Dietz — Chair <br />John Dietz, Troy Adams, Mark Fuchs, Theresa <br />Al Nadeau— Vice Chair <br />Slominski <br />Daryl Thompson — Trustee <br />MEETING DATE: <br />AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />October 21, 2014 <br />5.2 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Wage and Benefits Committee Update: Health and Dental Insurance <br />DISCUSSION: <br />Health Saving Account Insurance Plan Employer Contributions <br />At the September 9 Commission meeting, the Commission approved the 2015 renewal of the health <br />insurance plans. The Wage and Benefits Committee met on September 18 to discuss details of the <br />insurance renewal and the Health Saving Account (HSA) Insurance Plan employer contribution. In 2013 <br />when the Commission approved the 2014 addition of an alternate health insurance plan, the HSA plan, <br />they also approved an employer contribution. This contribution was approved for a minimum of two <br />years at which time the contribution amount would be reviewed by the W &BC and then proposed to the <br />Commission for approval. <br />One of the reasons for the HSA employer contribution was to incentivize employees to migrate to the <br />HSA plan from the more expensive traditional co -pay plan. The amounts for the contribution were <br />determined such that the cost to ERMU would be the same regardless of which plan the employee chose. <br />These amounts were: $1,885 for family; $1,230 for single plus one; and $600 for single. The incentive <br />worked well as ERMU experienced a 53% conversion to the HSA plan. In 2013 when the employer <br />contribution was approved, the conversion rate was anticipated to be lower. The contributions were based <br />on company's insurance plan population and a projected savings of $33,000. Because of the high <br />conversion rate and shift in the insurance plan population, ERMU realized a $43,000 savings from which <br />the employer contribution was funded. <br />The HSA renewal included a change to the deductible amounts for the plan. The family and single plus <br />one deductibles increase by $100, and the single deductible increases by $50. In the HSA plan, the family <br />and single plus one are actually the same plan with the deductible where as in the traditional co -pay plan <br />these were separate. In evaluation of the migration statistics, the lowest migration group was found to be <br />from the co -pay single plus one group. This is likely because the employer contribution was less than that <br />of family yet the deductible was the same as family. The difference for the employer contribution was <br />directly related to premium savings. <br />The W &BC reviewed the higher savings resulting from higher conversion and reviewed calculations <br />provided by staff that would increase the employer contributions to more closely match the premium <br />61 <br />P 0 W F R E 0 B 1 <br />WN-1. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />A <br />Power Provider <br />P O W E R E D To S E R V E <br />61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.