Laserfiche WebLink
City of <br /> Elk=' Request for Action <br /> River <br /> To Item Number <br /> Mayor and City Council 8.1 <br /> Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br /> General Business January 21, 2014 Tim Simon, Finance Director <br /> Item Description Reviewed by <br /> Issuance of$2,125,000 Electric Revenue Refunding Cal Portner, City Administrator <br /> Bonds, Series 2014A Reviewed by <br /> Action Requested <br /> Approve,by resolution,the issuance of Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds, and authorizing certain other <br /> actions to be taken by the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission with respect to the issuance of <br /> Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2014A. <br /> Background/Discussion <br /> As part of the debt monitoring process, our financial advisors and staff are continually evaluating the <br /> bond market to determine if it is feasible to refund existing bond issues. Elk River Municipal Utilities <br /> (ERMU) staff,with the guidance from their financial advisor, Springsted,has identified a refunding <br /> possibility with the 2006A Electric Revenue bonds. This series 2014A issue is a current refunding bond, <br /> in which the proceeds of the bonds are used to redeem the outstanding principal of the series 2006A <br /> bonds. These bonds will be repaid from the Electric Utility System. <br /> The city is the qualified entity to issue the bonds. On January 14, 2014, ERMU Commissioners adopted a <br /> resolution requesting the Council to approve the issuance of the refunding bonds. The structure of the <br /> refunding bonds is modified to be three years shorter than the remaining term of the original bonds. The <br /> original bonds would have matured on August 1, 2021. ERMU wants to be positioned for possible new <br /> bond issues related to the purchase power agreement with their new provider that will take effect in 2018. <br /> Schedule: <br /> January 14—Utilities Commission sets sale date and terms (approved) <br /> January 21 —City Council sets sale date and terms and authorizes Utility Commission to award the bonds <br /> January 27—Rating conference call <br /> February 11 —Bids received, commission action <br /> Financial Impact <br /> The bonds are not general obligations of the city but will be special limited obligations paid solely from <br /> the electric utility system. Estimated interest savings of the current refunding is approximately$202,222 <br /> or 6.89% net of issuance costs and a present value benefit of$166,732.40. True interest cost (TIC) is <br /> estimated to be 1.587% compared to the prior TIC of 3.947% on the 2006A bonds. <br /> Attachments <br /> • Springsted's summary of refunding bond issuance <br /> • Resolution <br /> P a w E A E U s r <br /> NaA f RE] <br />