My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3. ERMUSR 09-09-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2003
>
09-09-2003
>
6.3. ERMUSR 09-09-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2013 9:51:57 AM
Creation date
10/16/2013 9:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
9/9/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities <br /> 322 King Avenue phone: 763.441.2020 <br /> Elk River,MN 55330 Fax:763.441.8099 <br /> September 3, 2003 <br /> To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> John Dietz <br /> Jerry Takle <br /> James Tralle <br /> From: Bryan C. Adams <br /> Subject: Street Light Maintenance <br /> Both the City and Elk River Municipal Utilities, are in the budgeting process for 2004 <br /> and beyond. One issue that needs to be addressed is street light maintenance. The <br /> immediate issue is Main Street lights, but the broader issue is the steel and aluminum <br /> light poles on the major roadways and semaphores at the intersections. <br /> To the best of my understanding, the Elk River Municipal Utilities is to provide the <br /> electricity at no cost to the City and replace the lamps at no cost to the City, because we <br /> have the equipment to do so. We are starting to go far beyond this maintenance issue into <br /> much more repair work. My question to this commission is, should we be doing more <br /> than lamp replacement? City staff is under the impression, we do all street light <br /> maintenance. <br /> A typical example is Main Street lights. As these lights are hit by vehicles, we reinstall <br /> these lights and often replace the light post if damaged. Sometimes the persons hitting <br /> the pole, insurance reimburses us the cost, but often we absorb these costs. As the street <br /> light arms fail, we have paid to have new arms fabricated and we reinstall (see the <br /> attached pictures). The anchor bolts have been rusting off, so we designed, paid for <br /> installed new anchor bolts, and reinstalled the light. The anchor bolt issue was going to <br /> be a joint Utility/City project, but it just didn't happen due to scheduling available <br /> manpower. For safety reasons, the arm replacement and anchor bolt replacement needs <br /> to happen in a timely fashion. In the last purchase of replacement arms and anchor bolt <br /> assemblies, we have expensed approximately $7,000 in material only. <br /> My real concern, is the future painting or replacement costs of metal street light poles and <br /> semaphores (see the attached pictures). This will be expensive and an on going endeavor. <br /> Who is the party responsible for these costs? Staff solicits your comments on this issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.