My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. ERMUSR 08-12-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2003
>
08-12-2003
>
5.2. ERMUSR 08-12-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2013 8:39:48 AM
Creation date
10/16/2013 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/12/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River 1. <br /> Municipal Utilities <br /> 322 King.Avenue phone: 763.441.2020 <br /> Elk River.%IN ;5330 iy:Th3.-HL8099 <br /> July 28, 2003 <br /> To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> John Dietz <br /> Jerry Takle <br /> James Tralle <br /> From: Bryan C. Adams <br /> Subject: Annual URGE Tests <br /> Elk River Municipal Utilities operates and maintains 4 diesel generation units at our <br /> power plant. These units are contracted to Great River Energy through a Power <br /> Transaction Agreement at the current price of$2.75/kw/month based upon the proven <br /> capacity from the annual URGE test. The current contract expires October 31. 2003. <br /> The chances of increasing. the payment amount is small. The attached letter reflects this <br /> years URGE test results. The URGE test results have steadily increased the past few <br /> years due to more maintenance and better training. Again your staff of Mike Price, <br /> Adam Freiberg. and Steve Ziemer did a great job performing this URGE test. The <br /> capacity results from this test will result in $343.431 in annual payments from Great <br /> River Energy. <br /> Units one and two are 1948-550kw, black start Worthington units. Unit #2 needs some <br /> major work or should be retired. The main bearings are badly worn along with the timing <br /> gear. Ignoring the cost ramifications, it has been staffs desire to retire unit#2, salvage <br /> the parts and use them in unit #1 when necessary, and replace this unit with a larger <br /> engine. The plant substation has a capacity of approximately 12.9MVA. We have <br /> physical room to replace unit #2 with a?000kw machine. <br /> Installed costs for a good used engine/generator is in the 400kw area or $800.000. <br /> Annual revenue from our current Great River Energy agreement at $2.75/kw would be <br /> $66,000 or a payback of approximately 20 years at 5% annual interest. Not a good <br /> investment financially. <br /> Another 21\4W of capacity to keep the essentials of Elk River in power would be nice to <br /> have under our control in case of a total power grid failure. We would then have 12MW <br /> at the plant and 2.4MW at the Landfill. Our current peaks are 38±MW summer and <br /> 25±MW winter. Rolling blackouts will still be necessary. On the other hand, I am not <br /> sure if another 2MW is all that significant if we can not carry our entire load. Do you <br /> have any other thoughts on this issue? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.