My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 01-26-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
01/26/2004
>
5.1. SR 01-26-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:20 AM
Creation date
2/2/2004 3:15:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 5.1. <br /> <br />City ~ <br /> l ver <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Stephen Rohlf, Building and Zoning Administrator <br />January 26, 2004 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Discuss County Ditch Issues <br /> <br />Staffwould like to discuss two issues regarding county ditches with the City Council. <br />County Ditch Inspector, John Norgren, will also be in attendance. <br /> <br />The first issue is the cleanout of County Ditch 31, which roughly runs from County Road <br />33 through the Elk River Country Club's property. The attached aerial photo shows the <br />area proposed to be cleaned. Also attached is a letter regarding the project from Mr. <br />Norgren, dated December 21, 2003. <br /> <br />The lowest bid for this project is $32,725.00. Payment will come from city's Surface <br />Water Management Fund. This work is needed, staff recommends the Council <br />authorizes it, and staff will compile a letter to the County Board stating such. <br /> <br />The second issue is in regards to County Ditch 28. This ditch has three branches. One <br />branch lies solely within the City of Elk River, a second is almost entirely with the city's <br />boundaries, and the third is almost entirely in Big Lake Township. <br /> <br />Property owners in Big Lake Township have complained to the county about paying <br />assessment for branches of this ditch that don't benefit them. Staff agrees with their <br />argument that the situation is not equitable. <br /> <br />The County Attorney's Office is proposing to create Subordinate Service Districts, which <br />will allow the three branches discussed to be assessed separately. A Subordinate Service <br />District would allow the three branches of Ditch 28 to be billed separately. Property <br />owners will only be billed for work on the branch where their water runs and the County <br />will continue to provide the same functions such as ditch inspection. Staff requests the <br />Council's permission to pursue this issue with the City Attorney. If appropriate, a <br />recommendation on Subordinate Service District will be brought back for the Council's <br />consideration at a later date. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.