My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4. PC MIN 08-13-2013 DRAFT
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2013
>
09-10-2013
>
4. PC MIN 08-13-2013 DRAFT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2013 1:00:58 PM
Creation date
9/6/2013 1:00:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
8/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL <br /> TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2013 <br /> Members Present: Chair Anderson,Commissioners Eric Johnson,Jeremy Johnson,Keefe, <br /> Keller,Konietzko and Westberg <br /> Members Absent: None <br /> Staff Present: Deputy Director, Community Operations&Development Jeremy <br /> Barnhart,Planner/Park Planner Chris Leeseberg,Planning Intern Zach <br /> Carlton, and Recording Secretary Debbie Huebner <br /> Also Present: City Attorney Peter Beck,Councilmember Barb Burandt <br /> 1. Call Meeting To Order <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Planning Commission <br /> was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Vice Chair Westberg. <br /> 2. Consider 8/13/13 Planning Commission Agenda <br /> MOVED BY COMMISSIONER ERIC JOHNSON AND SECONDED BY <br /> COMMISSIONER WESTBERG TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 13,2013. <br /> MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> 4.1 Request by Preferred Powder Coating for Site Plan Review. 10846 170th Ct. NW <br /> The staff report was presented by Jeremy Barnhart. Mr.Barnhart reviewed the proposed <br /> building design details. He stated that the Planning Commission is asked to review the <br /> variation in design, specifically, the east elevation facing Twin Lakes Road. <br /> Commissioner Westberg asked if a future expansion would be impeded by the gas pipeline. <br /> Mr.Barnhart explained that an expansion would likely be a separate building as an accessory <br /> strcture. Commissioner Westberg asked if approval of the variation from the business park <br /> design standards would set a precedent. Mr. Barnhart stated that there could be that <br /> potential,but each decision is unique. He stated that in this instance, the city is getting what <br /> they expected and meets the intent of the design standards. <br /> Chair Anderson concurred that each site is different. He stated that the large size of the <br /> parcel and the 480—580 ft. setback Twin Lakes Road made this site unique. Chair <br /> Anderson stated that he felt the overhead doors and other features provide sufficient breaks <br /> in the elevation. <br /> Commissioner Keller stated that it did not make sense to require a mix of materials/finishes, <br /> since they would not even be visible at such a distance (from Twin Lakes Road). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.