My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1. SR 06-03-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
06-03-2013
>
8.1. SR 06-03-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2013 9:32:08 AM
Creation date
5/31/2013 9:30:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/3/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of <br /> Elk REQUEST FOR ACTION <br /> River <br /> TO ITEM NUMBER <br /> Mayor and City Council 8.1 <br /> AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY <br /> General Business June 3, 2013 Chris Leeseber , Park Planner-Planner <br /> ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By <br /> Review Ordinance as it Relates to Fencing of Pools and Jeremy Barnhart,Deputy Director, <br /> Automatic Pool Covers COD <br /> REVIEWED BY <br /> Cal Portner, City Administrator <br /> ACTION REQUESTED <br /> Provide staff direction. <br /> BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION <br /> At the May 6,2013, meeting Open Forum,the City Council directed staff to research the history of pool <br /> covers and fences and report back. This direction was in response to a property owner who wishes to <br /> utilize a retractable pool cover in lieu of a fence. <br /> In 2006, the Council reviewed the ordinance regarding fencing for both above-ground and in-ground <br /> pools. The Council approved an ordinance in which all in-ground pools require fencing and all above- <br /> ground pools would not. Automatic pool covers were not discussed. <br /> The discussion centered around above-ground pools. The ordinance at the time read that above-ground <br /> pools required fencing,regardless of their size. This included the small blue inflatable type pools that <br /> were popular at the time. It was presented and supported that the sidewalls of an above-ground pool <br /> would act as a barrier. Someone physically had to try to get into an above-ground pool as they could not <br /> accidentally fall up and over the side walls. The fence requirement was removed, as long as the ladder <br /> was removed when not in use. <br /> The purpose for a fence with in-ground pools is to act as a barrier to prevent a baby/toddler or <br /> inattentive adult from accidentally falling into a pool. The desire was to have a permanent barrier to the <br /> pool area to prevent anyone from accidently falling into a "hole in the ground." <br /> The functionality, ability, and strength of automatic pool covers are not in question. The concern is that <br /> they only work when physically closed and covering the pool, an action required every time the pool is <br /> left unattended. Fencing is always in place creating the desired barrier. <br /> Fencing is not perfect as a gate may be left open allowing accidental entry. This opening is narrow in <br /> comparison to the overall length of a fence. A non-closed pool cover creates a pool that has its entire <br /> perimeter subject to accidental entry into the pool. <br /> NaA f RE] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.