Laserfiche WebLink
River <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />FROPI: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Mayor and Council <br />Pat Klaers, C'j~_~dm~strator <br /> <br />June 24, 2002 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Discussion on City Involvement with School Fields <br /> <br />Item 5.8. <br /> <br />For many years field scheduling and maintenance were never any problem. The school <br />district was the only unit of government that had facilities and all the scheduling and <br />maintenance was done by the school district (community education) and youth associations. <br /> <br />The community recreation organization was established in 1992 and this organization <br />eventually took over the coordination of field scheduling with each host city being <br />responsible for maintenance. The school district no longer maintained their fields during the <br />summer and any fees that were collected from the associations to offset expenses went to <br />the host communities. <br /> <br />Today the situation is more complex than in the early days and when managed under <br />community recreation. Today community recreation no longer exists and cities are offering <br />and coordinating recreation activities. Today most cities have some of their own fields and <br />even the VFW has soccer fields available in Otsego. Additionally, coordination with more <br />than one association per sport for field scheduling has become an issue. <br /> <br />Maintenance and scheduling of school facilities came to a head this spring when United <br />Soccer wanted to use school facilities that were not available. Due to growth in the Three <br />Rivers Soccer Association (TRSA), they had scheduled all the available fields. In prior years <br />there were a sufficient number of fields in and around Elk River to accommodate everyone. <br />What made the field scheduling issue in 2002 even more difficult was the past relationship <br />with the TRSA, whereby this group has invested funds into field development and soccer <br />goals and United, as a newer organization, has not made this same investment. Also, it <br />should be noted that fields were available in other communities within the school district but <br />were not being used because they either were not being maintained by the host city and/or <br />they were not in the best location. <br /> <br />The timing of this conflict over school field scheduling happening this year was unfortunate <br />as this is the first year of Elk River's city recreation program. City recreation assumed many <br />of the existing policies of community recreation. City scheduling of the school fields resulted <br />in policy questions from the School Board at our joint May 23, 2002 meeting. The City <br /> <br /> <br />