My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.4. SR 03-04-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
03-04-2013
>
4.4. SR 03-04-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2013 11:36:02 AM
Creation date
3/1/2013 11:26:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/4/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk REQUEST FOR ACTION <br /> River <br /> TO ITEM NUMBER <br /> Mayor and City Council 4.4 <br /> AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY <br /> Consent March 4, 2013 Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager <br /> ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By <br /> Request for Proposal for Comprehensive Plan Suzanne Fischer, Community <br /> Operations &Development Director <br /> REVIEWED BY <br /> Cal Portner, City Administrator <br /> ACTION REQUESTED <br /> Authorize by motion to advertise for proposals to complete the 2013 Comprehensive Plan. <br /> BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION <br /> Included in the 2013 budget were funds to the Comprehensive Plan. The initial step is to request <br /> proposals. Staff has prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) outlining what the city seeks and the process <br /> of recommending a consultant. <br /> The RFP requests written submittals to update the existing 2004 Comprehensive Plan. The RFP outlines <br /> the need for a participatory process that,at its conclusion,will provide short and long term goals to <br /> achieve the community vision. Details of the participatory process are not prescribed;how a respondent <br /> plans to achieve this critical component is key to the success of the proposal. It is recognized that the <br /> public input portion of this project is by far the most costly. <br /> Staff intends to send the RFP to firms with experience working on similar projects or those that have <br /> worked with staff in the recent past. The RFP will also be posted on the League of Minnesota Cities <br /> website. RFPs are due March 29. <br /> During the 2013 budgeting phase,the feasibility to combine the Comprehensive Plan and the Parks <br /> Master Plan was discussed. Staff is not opposed to a joint effort;however,the level of detail in each <br /> project is expected to be vastly different, and therefore, a combined plan is not recommended. It is <br /> anticipated however,that the two projects will share base information including demographic research. <br /> This will reduce the cost of the Park Master Plan which is expected to start later this year. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT <br /> The 2013 budget includes $80,000 from various departments to update the Comprehensive Plan. This <br /> figure was based on recent experience from neighboring communities. Proposals over this budget may <br /> affect the timing and/or the scope of the project. <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> ■ RFP draft <br /> POWERED 0 <br /> 1`4 f U R E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.