My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. ERMUSR 02-12-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2013
>
02-12-2013
>
5.3. ERMUSR 02-12-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2013 4:22:28 PM
Creation date
2/11/2013 4:22:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
2/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�1 <br /> Elk River t; <br /> Municipal Utilities UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br /> TO: FROM: <br /> Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Troy Adams, P.E. —General Manager <br /> John Dietz—Chair <br /> Daryl Thompson—Vice Chair <br /> Al Nadeau—Trustee <br /> MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br /> February 12, 2013 5.3 <br /> SUBJECT: <br /> Tax Exempt Financing <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> For more than 100 years, the concept that one body of government should not tax another body of <br /> government has existed. Currently, the owners of municipal bonds are not required to pay federal income <br /> tax on the interest income they receive from the bonds. (And,the owners of federal bonds are not <br /> required to pay state and local income tax on the interest they receive from those bonds.) Municipal <br /> bonds are a tool that local government entities finance their critical infrastructures including but not <br /> limited to: electric, water, wastewater,and gas systems; roads and bridges;government buildings, <br /> schools, and hospitals. <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> Beginning in 2010 and again with the recent"fiscal cliff' negotiations,Congress and the Executive <br /> branch have discussed making changes to the federal income tax exemption on municipal bonds. The <br /> elimination of these exemptions would result in one body of government taxing another. This would also <br /> result on a crippling effect on local government's ability to finance new or maintenance on critical <br /> infrastructures. The increase cost of money to finance these critical infrastructures would inevitably be <br /> passed on through taxes, fees, and rates. For municipal utilities, this additional cost of doing business <br /> places additional burdens on the utility's ability to remain competitive. <br /> The elimination of tax exempt financing does not provide any real savings to taxpayers. The savings at <br /> the federal level would just be passed down to taxpayers at the state and local level. Federal deficit <br /> reduction efforts should focus on potential reduction strategies that provide saving, not pass them on to <br /> others. Because of the ramifications of the elimination of tax exempt financing to municipal <br /> governments, this topic will be a priority for MMUA this year. <br /> ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution supporting the preservation of tax exempt <br /> financing. <br /> ATTACHMENTS: <br /> • Proposed ERMU Resolution Number 13-1 <br /> �$ Page 1 of I !POWERED <br /> NATURE <br /> Reliable Public <br /> Power Provider P O W E R E D T o S E R V E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.