My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 01-22-2013
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2013
>
01-22-2013
>
10.2. SR 01-22-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 9:46:22 AM
Creation date
1/18/2013 9:43:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACTION REQUESTED <br />Provide direction to staff. <br />BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION <br />In April 2006, Pat Briggs received site plan approval to construct 14,420 square foot retail office building <br />on a lot at 19022 Freeport Street. City staff, through the internal site plan review process, approved the <br />project because it was a permitted use and complied with all applicable ordinances at the time. <br />The approved building was identified as Phase 1 of a larger project. Phase 2 proposed to include a new <br />restaurant building on the vacant lot south of the subject property. This vacant lot is owned by the <br />school district. There was no deadline for when Phase 2 was to be constructed. <br />The second phase has not been constructed. <br />Both projects were to share the northern entrance drive off of Freeport Street. Parking for the Briggs <br />building was installed on the north side of the drive. Additional parking was planned for the south side <br />of the drive once that lot developed. No curb and gutter were installed on the south side of the drive, <br />using the exception allowed by section 30 -901 (2): "the city may grant an exemption from the curbing <br />requirement where the city has approved future expansion of the parking lot." <br />The city recently received a complaint from an Elk River businessman who believes he is unfairly <br />burdened by having to install curbing on his project while a competitor was not required to install similar <br />improvements. He has concerns with having to wait six years for a future phase with no end in sight. <br />Staff understands the complainant's concern, but does not feel that the property owner is in violation of <br />our ordinance. One of the challenges to development is that it rarely occurs on a preconceived schedule. <br />Options <br />To address the complaint, staff has identified numerous options, assuming an application for Phase 2 is <br />not received in the near future: <br />1. Inform the complainant that the curb will be added when Phase 2 is constructed. In the <br />future, stipulate a time frame for future phases. <br />PMaWERE0 0Y <br />N: \Public Bodies \City Council \Council RCA \Agenda Packet \01 -22- 2013 \10,2.docx INATURE] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.