Laserfiche WebLink
Elk River; <br />Municipal U <br />UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />Troy Adams, P.E. — General Manager <br />John Dietz — Chair <br />Daryl Thompson — Vice Chair <br />Al Nadeau — Trustee <br />MEETING DATE: <br />AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />September 11, 2012 <br />4.1 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Easement Considerations for Property Adjacent to Diesel Power Plant <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Located east of ERMU's power plant is a 6.6 acre lot with the address 1703 Main St NW (Parcel <br />ID 75- 133 - 4210). This property has no recorded easement for access to Main Street and <br />currently accesses the property through the ERMU Diesel Power Plant property (Parcel ID 75- <br />411 -0110) and ERMU Shop and Storage Building (Parcel ID 75- 411 - 0130). On July l7, the <br />Utilities Commission authorized Utilities staff to begin evaluating the specifics of the issue and <br />work towards developing a mutually beneficial solution. The authorization for preliminary work <br />was limited with a $4,000 maximum cost. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />Staff has been working with the City of Elk River on determining possible solutions. The <br />Utilities contracted Hakanson Anderson to provide survey work. A proposed access running line <br />was staked along the east boarder of the Utilities' property and connected to Main Street to the <br />north of the property. The City and State met at the site for a Technical Evaluation Panel <br />meeting. The City has communicated with ERMU that the proposed route or any route that <br />disrupts the wetland or wetland fringe would not be supported. The City is the Local Governing <br />Unit that would have final authority on this. <br />There are a number of options for consideration: <br />1. Grant easement through the current point of access through the material storage yard and <br />along the south of the Utilities' Diesel Power Plant. Regardless of compensation for the <br />easement, this option would create potential future issues with security and access <br />regulations for an electrical generation facility. This would also continue exposure to <br />liabilities that exist with public access through a municipally owned utilities' material <br />yard and travel adjacent to a municipally owned generation facility. This would also <br />continue exposure to theft. However, this option would be desirable to the property <br />owner and to the City's Environmental Administrator. <br />RR P e E drE e e r <br />Page 1 of 2 N" A Fy l VR� <br />Reliable Public <br />Power Provider P o w r n r o T o S r x v r <br />