My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8. EDSR 01-9-2012
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2012
>
01-09-2012
>
8. EDSR 01-9-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2012 1:03:52 PM
Creation date
1/5/2012 1:03:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
1/9/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of <br />Elk. <br />River <br />REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />TO ITEM NUMBER <br />Economic Develo ment Authori g <br />AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY <br /> anua 9, 2012 ustin Femrite, Ci En ~ eer <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED By <br />Authorization to use development funds to cover costs <br />associated with the 171St Area Phase 1 Improvements REVIEWED BY <br />ACTION REQUESTED <br />Authorization to use $700,000 from the Economic Development Authority development fund towards <br />the 171St Area -Phase 1 Improvements as detailed in the attached Preliminary Engineering Report. <br />BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION <br />Over the last year staff has been working on an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and <br />Preliminary Engineering report for the 171St Area development In the fall of 2010, the City Council <br />approved a phasing plan that provided the framework to systematically start development of the City <br />owned property. south of 171St Avenue, formerly the Cargill property. <br />The attached report details the improvements required to begin with Phase 1 of the development and the <br />associated costs for implementation. This report was reviewed by the City Council at their December 12, <br />2011, meeting. Direction from the City Council was to move forward with the project as detailed in the <br />report. <br />At the January 9, 2012, EDA meeting, I will review the preliminary engineering information and <br />associated funding request with you. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />The total estimated cost for the improvements proposed for 2012 is $1,312,000. This estimate includes <br />construction costs, a 10% contingency, wetland permitting, easement acquisition, and 25% for <br />engineering, legal, and administrative costs. <br />The EDA is asked to commit $700,000 from its development fund to cover a portion of the project <br />costs. This amount represents the full contribution of the EDA based on no grant funding being <br />received. Staff will continue to pursue all available funding opportunities to offset some of the costs for <br />this project. If a grant is obtained, the funding would be used to offset the EDA contribution for the <br />project. <br />The current balance of the EDA's development fund is $1,575, 059. Of this, $109,920 is the minimum <br />balance to cash flow the EDA between tax settlements, therefore the remaining $1,465,139 is available <br />for development projects. Utilizing the $700,000 from the EDA development fund for Phase I <br />C:\Users\dhuebner\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.0utlook\2TFRCC~~V\EDA RFA 1-9-12.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.