Laserfiche WebLink
Eminent domain conference committee to consider several controversial issues this week Page 1 of 2 <br />INFORMATION <br />iii e ~ u~.~. ~ din <br />6NCI NE EUITYVN <br />Eminent domain conference committee to consider several <br />controversial issues this week <br />Issue 13 Published: May 2, 2006 <br />By Laura Harris <br />The conference committee on HF 2846 /SF_2750, the eminent domain reform legislation, met last <br />Friday to adopt various technical changes to the House and Senate language and consider identical and <br />similar provisions in the two bills. <br />Conferees adopted an amendment offered by Sen. Tom Bakk (DFL-Cook) that included several <br />technical changes and limited the new public notice and hearing requirements to takings for blight <br />mitigation, contamination remediation, the reduction of abandoned property, and the removal of a <br />public nuisance. <br />The conference committee also adopted several definitions, including the Senate language on <br />"abandoned property" and "blighted area," and the Senate definition of "structurally substandard" <br />minus the provision allowing the acquisition of a building that is "unsafe or lacking in basic <br />equipment." Members discussed the House and Senate provisions providing access to structurally <br />substandard buildings, but did not reach an agreement on final language. <br />The threshold determining environmental contamination was the subject of lengthy discussion. Both <br />bills define "environmentally contaminated area" as an area where more than 50 percent of the parcels <br />contain contamination and where the cost of clean up exceeds 100 percent of the estimated market <br />value of the parcel. The city of Columbia Heights offered testimony that all but one of the parcels in the <br />city's 30-acre industrial redevelopment project would not meet the 100 percent cost threshold as <br />defined in the House and Senate bills. A Senate motion to set both thresholds at 75 percent failed to <br />pass. However, the committee agreed that further discussion regarding the various provisions related to <br />contamination is needed. <br />Conferees took testimony on a few other issues, including the provisions regulating the extraterritorial <br />use of eminent domain, requiring compensation for removal of a legal nonconforming use, and <br />requiring contested-case proceedings to determine relocation assistance. A motion to adopt the Senate <br />language on the nonconforming use provision failed to pass. Action on the other two provisions is <br />expected at the next meeting. <br />Reo. Jeff Johnson (R-Plymouth) indicated that Reo. Ron Abrams (R-Minnetonka) and Sen. Julianne <br />Ortman (R-Chanhassen) would lead a working group that will meet sometime this week to discuss <br />effective-date issues. Sen. Bakk announced the full conference committee would likely meet again the <br />middle of this week to consider several substantive issues, including the standard of proof, payment of <br />attorney fees, and compensation for loss of going concern. <br />http://www.lmnc.org/bulletin/story.efin?id=1147&title_id=1 5/3/2006 <br />