4.1 PCSR 11-23-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REQUEST FOR ACTION TO ~ ITEM NUMBER Plannin Commission 4.1. AGENDA SECTION MEETING DATE PREPARED BY Plannin Items November 23, 2010 erem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er ITEM DESCRIPTION REVIEWED B)/ Request by Dennis Cornelius on behalf of Amcon and Spectrum High School, for Conditional Use Permit for an Educational REVIEWED BY Institution in the Business Park Zoning District, Public Hearing - Case NO. CU 10-22 ACTION REQUESTED Based on the information provided to date, Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit allowing a charter school to operate at 17796 Industrial Circle, as illustrated on plans dated October 29, 2010 and as described in applicant's narrative dated September 24, 2010, subject to the following conditions and statements for the record: 1. As a Conditional Use Permit is not a Building Permit, the applicant shall apply for all require permits. 2. The building shall meet all building and fire codes. 3. Capacity of the school shall not exceed 525 students. 4. Inclusion of grades younger than 6`'' grade will require amendment to the CUP 5. No parking on the adjacent public streets. 6. Written verification that the sports field is an acceptable use under the UPA easement. 7. All signage will be consistent with the Business Park Zoning District regulations. 8. Due to the industrial nature of the neighborhood, the school recognizes that noise, odors, truck traffic and noise, and other undesirable effects may be present. At their meeting on November 9``', the Planning Commission discussed adding the following condition: 9. Provide abiking/walking plan as an alternative means of getting to and from school safely. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION This issue was presented to the Planning Commission at their meeting on November 9r''. During the public hearing, a neighboring business operator (Dwayne Goetsch, Gradient Technology) voiced concerns, noting that the school may impact his BATF permit which may result in the alteration of his business practices. He noted concerns with drainage associated with the proposed development, added traffic and parking. Receiving the concerns regarding the impact to his permits, the Planning Commission tabled action on the item pending further information.