My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5. PCSR 06-08-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
06-08-2010
>
5.5. PCSR 06-08-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2010 11:15:45 AM
Creation date
6/4/2010 3:30:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
6/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />To Item Number <br />Plannin Commission 5.5. <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Planning Items June 8, 2010 Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Request by City of Elk River for Ordinance Amendment Jerem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er <br />Regarding I-1 and I-2 Industrial Zones in the Urban Service Reviewed by <br />District, Public Hearing -Care No. OA 70-OS <br />Action Requested <br />Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as drafted. <br />Problem Statement <br />Staff is concerned that land uses that do not require water or sewer, or high capacity street infrastructure <br />(for example, mini storage), if located in areas with those services, reduce the ability for the Cityto attract <br />businesses and operations employing greater numbers of people, in part because there is less land <br />available for them. <br />Employment is predominantly centered in the Business Park and industrial zones, and land available in <br />these zones is dwindling. The majority of these areas are developed. (The Focused Area Study identifies <br />some areas focused toward job creation, but much of that is redevelopment, and therefore, more <br />expensive. Secondly, it is anticipated that the mining area will host large scale employment in the future, <br />but due to the ongoing mining operations, and the cost to extend water and sewer, this is not expected <br />until well into the future.) <br />Background/Discussion <br />While all non residential zones provide for employment, the areas of the cityfocused for employment <br />growth are the industrial (I-1, I-2) and business park (BP) zones. Employment areas generally require <br />water and sanitary sewer, higher quality access routes for both personal and delivery vehicles, and <br />personal amenities. Proximityto services (food, shopping, and personal care) and proximity to <br />recreational amenities (walking, green space, etc) have also been identified as desirable qualities for <br />employment growth. <br />There are several I-1, I-2, and business park zones scattered throughout the city, mostly along Hwy 10 <br />and the southern portion of County Rd 1. About a third of these areas are outside of the urban services <br />district. Areas outside of the urban services district are not expected to have water and sewer extended to <br />them. <br />Because it is difficult to deny an application for a ministorage business in the sewered area of the city (a <br />conditional use in the current ordinance), Staff suggests developing a new zoning district, entitled General <br />Industrial. The general industrial is proposed as a mix of I-1 and I-2 permitted and conditional uses that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.