My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.9. SR 08-29-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
08/29/1994
>
5.9. SR 08-29-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:36:55 AM
Creation date
5/22/2007 1:48:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/29/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />rll ~( <br />( II <br />!lk River <br /> <br />ITEM 5.9. <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />LORI JOHNSON, FINANCE DIRECTOR <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />AUGUST 25, 1994 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: HEALTH INSURANCE <br /> <br />At the last City Council meeting, I verbally updated the Council on recent <br />developments with the employee health insurance issue. The Council <br />requested that the issue be brought back for formal action on August 29. In <br />that regard, I will again provide background information on this issue as well <br />as cost comparisons for the various options available. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />First let me give you a very condensed version of some of the developments <br />that have taken place recently. The most important factor is that the Police <br />Union voted not to accept the PEIP Plan which the Union felt constituted a <br />decrease in the aggregate value of their benefits. This vote allowed the City <br />to split its group into two smaller groups; the Union group consisting of <br />fourteen members and the non-Union group consisting of forty-two members. <br />Current law does not allow a group to split simply in order to obtain better <br />insurance rates, however, a group can split if it is for other reasons such as a <br />bargaining unit agreement. This split means that the Police Union group <br />falls under the Minnesota Care Law affecting groups with between two to <br />twenty-nine members. The Minnesota Care Law guarantees coverage and <br />premiums which are determined by base rates with a maximum increase of <br />up to 67 percent based on health histories. The final rates proposed for the <br />Police Union will not be available until after all the health history <br />information has been obtained. However, on the attached sheet, I have <br />provided both the best and worst case Medica rates. In discussing the <br />premium ranges with the City's insurance agent, it is our feeling that the <br />rates will be closer to mid-point between the best and worst case scenarios. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Although the Minnesota Care Law applies to the Union employees, it does <br />not, at this time, apply to the non-Union employee group. Effective July 1, <br />1995, the Minnesota Care Law changes so that groups of two to forty-nine <br />members are covered. That means that on July 1, 1995, the non-Union group <br />will also be eligible for coverage under the Minnesota Care Law. This means <br />two things. First it means that we cannot be denied coverage by an <br />insurance company. As you know, we had seven companies refuse to offer <br />coverage to the City based on our outstanding medical conditions. Second, <br /> <br />P.O. Box 490 · 13065 Orono Parkway · Elk River, MN 55330 · (612) 441-7420 · Fax: (612) 441-7425 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.