03-24-1986 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE ELK RIVER CITY HALL MONDAY, MARCH 24, 1986 . MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Schuldt, Williams, Engstrom, and Gunkel MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Lori Johnson; Finance Director, Philip Hals; Public Works Superintendent, Thomas Zerwas; Police Chief, Fritz Dolejs; Liquor Store Manager ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Bob Wuornos of R.L. Wuornos & Associates, Mr. Duane Kropuenskeof First National Bank, Charlotte Novak - Municipal Liquor Store employee The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle. 2 . Agenda COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 24, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 3. Minutes of March 17, 1986 City Council Meeting The following corrections to the March 17th City Council minutes were noted: . Item 9 - Ordinance Amendment to C-2 Zoning District - add to motion, "COUNCIL- MEMBER SCHULDT OPPOSED" Item 12 - Conditional Use Permit Request by Florence Lene/Public Hearing - add to motion, "COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0." Item 13 - Conditional Use Permit Requested by Darrell Goskey/Public Hearing - motion to be revised to read, "COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-1. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL OPPOSED." COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 24, 1986 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AS AMENDED. COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 4. Review of Feasibility Study for King and Main Streets Tax Increment Financing Proposal Mayor Hinkle opened the discussion of the feasibility study by noting three items of concern to him: 1) .it may not be correct to assume that no ,relocation costs would be incurred regarding the municipal utilities, 2) if the utilities building were not part of the project and it were to remain in its present location, there may not be adequate parking, and 3) the desired 10 year bond retirement would probably have to be extended to 15 years. Discussion of the following parking issues followed: . 1) Whether or not the number of parking spaces shown would be adequate. 2) Whether or not the parking north of the Elk River Clinic would actually be available for City use, as shown on Figure 1.