Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />fiver <br />To Item Number <br />Ci Council 6.0. <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Bud et Worksession Se tember 7, 2010 Lori ohnson, Ci Administrator <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />2011 Tax Levy and Budget Discussion <br /> Reviewed by <br />Action Requested <br />Consider the following resolutions and motion for adoption no later than at the September 13 meeting: <br />1. A resolution authorizing the proposed property tax levy for collection in 2011. <br />2. A resolution approving the Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2011 tax levy. <br />3. A resolution approving the 2011 tax levy for economic development purposes for the Elk River <br />Economic Development Authority. <br />4. A motion to set the budget meeting at which public comment will be taken for December 6, 2010, <br />at 6:30 p.m. <br />Background/Discussion <br />The City is required to certify its maximum City levy and the HRA and EDA levies to the County <br />Auditor no later than September 15: The levy adopted in September may be reduced on December 6 <br />when the final levy is adopted, but it may not be increased. The levy adopted in September will be used <br />in the tax notices mailed to property owners in November. The Council must also schedule one regular <br />meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public comment will be taken. This meeting <br />date, scheduled for December 6, 2010, must also be set by September 15. <br />The remainder of the General fund and special revenue fund budgets that the Council has not yet <br />reviewed are attached. Those include the building safety, environmental, and energy city General fund <br />budgets, and the Storm Water Management, Safety, and Library special revenue fund budgets. Staff will <br />be present at the meeting to discuss these budgets with the Council. There are no significant changes in <br />these budgets for 2011. <br />Also attached is a sample levy resolution fox discussion. We have not received updated net tax capacity <br />data from Sherburne County, but expect to get that data before the levy is adopted on September 13. <br />The sample levy calls for a total levy identical to the 2010 payable levy. Consequently, the General fund <br />budget as proposed assumes tax revenue based on that total levy. Again, it is important to note that the <br />levy adopted now cannot be increased in December. If the revised NTC estimate from the County is <br />higher than the preliminary estimate, a revised levy resolution will be prepared for the September 13 <br />meeting. <br />If the levy is approved as discussed above, there is currently a General fund budget gap of $514,100 <br />before use of fund balance and without including LGA revenue of $686,800. As you may recall, the <br />N:\Public Bodies\City Council\Lori\2010\Budget req for action 9 7 10 fmal.doc <br />