My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. SR 05-17-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
05-17-2010
>
5.4. SR 05-17-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 3:05:21 PM
Creation date
5/14/2010 2:29:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/17/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
622
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in Section 900.42 of the City of Elk River Code of Ordinances, the city needs to <br />apply "Evaluation Critexia" for conditional uses found in 904.08 {7) of the city's <br />Shoreland Management Ordinance, to ensure the protection of Rice Lake. <br />Tt is staff's interpretation that the city does have the authority to determine the <br />type of land uses in a Shoreland District and that a landfill can be considered. <br />Dave Hills, Regional Hydrologist for the Minnesota Department of Natural <br />Resources agrees with this interpretation. <br />Y~ Technical Issues -Matt Ledvina's attached letter, dated October 18, 2001, <br />addresses the adequacy of the Landfill's proposal on a technical level. The Landfill's <br />proposed 3 to 1 slopes for the demolition area, which are consistent with the cells on <br />either side of it. Other technical concerns, such as storm water management and <br />protection of the cap over the existing MSW cell have been considered on a staff <br />level. If this request is approved, the recommendations contained in Mr. Ledvina's <br />letter should be made conditions of that approval. '~ <br />- Screening and Buffering -Besides the interpretation of the Shoreland <br />Management Ordinance, the mast critical issue involved in this request is screening <br />and buffering. The disposal of demolition debris is not allowed by state rules within <br />50 feet of a property line and the disposal of municipal solid waste is not allowed <br />within 200 feet. The city's permit is somewhat different in that it requires that a 200 <br />foot buffer strip remain £ree of.the disposal of MSW, demolition debris and <br />associated slopes and ber}ns. The purpose of this buffer is an attempt to preserve <br />adjacent property values and natural amenities by taking advantage of natural <br />screening and buffering. The city's buffer also leaves an area free of landfill activities <br />so that things like monitoring wells can be placed on the landfill property. <br />Through previous approvals, the Landfill has already been allowed to encroach on <br />the 200 foot buffer adjacent to the location of this current request. The city's <br />Railroad Hiking Trail is located to the west of the Landfill, where this expansion is <br />proposed. Because of how close the historic waste fill limit is to the city's property <br />in this location, the city has agreed to allow. monitoring wells on its property. <br />Due to it being in the proximity to the Railroad Hiking Trail, the Park and <br />Recreation Commission has been asked to comment on this request. They believe <br />that it is critical for the Landfill to demonstrate that the hiking trail will be better <br />screened after the work under this proposal is accomplished than it was before, since <br />the advantage of distance from the proposal will be sacrificed. The Park and <br />Recreation Commission did not review the actual screening plan proposed by the <br />Landfill, but the attached landscaping plan does reflect the details recommended by <br />the Planning Commission. <br />Other Landfill Issues ,,, <br />When a request is made to modify an existing CUP, all pertinent issues regarding the subject <br />operation are up for consideration. The following are ongoing issues that the Landfill and <br />staff have been dealing with since the last renewal of their permits: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.